> Which of the two is recommended? And how have people been doing this > in practice? I was thinking that if the performance hit would be too > large, I could implement part of my business logic in a separate layer > with Neo4J running embedded, and then expose more course grained > services through REST myself. Or would that be prematurely?
I took a look at the source code and it (REST code) looks simple and sweet. However, it would suck though to have to have different programming models just because a server is local or remote. It seems that https://svn.neo4j.org/laboratory/components/rest-graphdb/ was created to address that, but that seems to be an abandoned experiment (only partially implemented and current has compile errors)... anyone knows what plans there are in that direction? I'm probably going for an RMI based solution (actually in-mem since I'm just prototyping, but I want to make sure we can scale properly before we settle for Neo4J), though I'd prefer a REST based one but then as things are now I'd have to create a rest-graphdb like solution myself. Again, thanks for any further hints, Eelco _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
