Hi! > Yeah, that could be useful... then on the other hand, the start position > could perhaps be handled separately in that the traverser will stop > asking other evaluators if it has gotten EXCLUDE from one evaluator > (PRUNEing the start node is just ridiculous). It may be a good thing > since excluding the start node is such a common scenario and getting rid > of that lastRelationship()==null (or position.depth()==0) check in every > single evaluator you write is a good thing. I'll look into it.
If this could be done without making things confusing in some other way it would be super nice! :-) /anders _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
