On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:15 AM, David Montag <david.mon...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
>> One key point of Davids suggestion is that it takes into account that each >> action of the user could take place from a different IP. Massimo's original >> model implied that the user would always be at the same IP for all actions, >> or if he could change IP's you would not know which of them related to which >> action. >> So even though Davids model is more complex, it seems more correct. >> Another solution is to create a uid-ip node, representing all cases where >> a particular user is at a particular IP. Then that would have direct >> relations to all domains (as massimo originally had), and it would have a >> single relationship to it's user and it's ip nodes. The graph looks similar >> to Davids, but we would have much fewer nodes (all actions from the same >> uid-ip are merged). > > This is exactly what I meant. I'm sorry for being late, I got some unexpected issue... Anyway I've come to think about this and indeed this seems pretty nice and would reduce a lot my load during queries but I'll loose information like: http method, schema and protocol, response size and code... I don't want to loose that information, I need to know where and when I got 404, but it seems neo4j cannot "handle" it ... at least the way I've thought. BTW In my original design there's a flaw that your suggestion has helped to highlight so thanks! Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
