Started a support discussion about this: http://help.neo4j.org/discussions/questions/8-re-neo4j-unique-constaint-on-index
2011/7/14 Mattias Persson <matt...@neotechnology.com> > Creating a support discussion for this. > > > 2011/7/7 Michael Hunger <michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> > >> I'd second that for 1.5 >> >> Michael >> >> Sent from my iBrick4 >> >> >> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail: >> >> *Von:* Aseem Kishore <aseem.kish...@gmail.com> >> *Datum:* 7. Juli 2011 18:14:59 MESZ >> *An:* Neo4j user discussions <user@lists.neo4j.org> >> *Betreff:* *Re: [Neo4j] Unique Constaint on Index* >> *Antwort an:* Neo4j user discussions <user@lists.neo4j.org> >> >> I'll strongly +1 that having a concept of "unique" index values should be >> built into Neo4j. It's just too common of a requirement. >> >> Aseem >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:48 AM, etc3 <e...@nextideapartners.com> wrote: >> >> I'm new to this framework, is there an example that demonstrates removing >> a >> >> non-existent property and how it would be used in this context? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] >> >> On >> >> Behalf Of Chris Gioran >> >> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:04 AM >> >> To: Neo4j user discussions >> >> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Unique Constaint on Index >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> the ability to acquire locks cluster-wide exists, albeit in an ad hoc >> >> fashion. Grabbing a write lock on the node you want to ensure is uniquely >> >> indexed will ensure that the operations are serialized across all cluster >> >> members. >> >> The most simple way to get that lock currently is the (somewhat hackish >> but >> >> entirely correct) removal of a non-existing property. >> >> >> cheers, >> >> CG >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:53 PM, etc3 <e...@nextideapartners.com> wrote: >> >> How do I ensure another request is not performing the same operation >> >> on another node in the cluster? >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: <user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org>user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org >> >> [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Marko Rodriguez >> >> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:35 AM >> >> To: Neo4j user discussions >> >> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Unique Constaint on Index >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> We are testing Neo4J and need to support unique emails across all >> >> users. Is this possible with the current API? >> >> >> You can add such a constraint when updating the indices: >> >> >> if(index.get('email', address).hasNext()) { >> >> throw new RuntimeException("There are two nodes that share the same >> >> email address."); } else { >> >> index.put('email', address, node); >> >> } >> >> >> Marko. >> >> >> http://markorodriguez.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Neo4j mailing list >> >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Neo4j mailing list >> >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Neo4j mailing list >> >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Neo4j mailing list >> >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] > Hacker, Neo Technology > www.neotechnology.com > -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
