Yes, you are right. I had looked at the code too superficially. Still, 
something goes wrong reading the indexName, when I print that name it looks 
like garbage (upon recovery), while it should produce a readable index name. I 
didn't check if the value written to the record is actually a readable String. 
Niels

> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:23:49 +0200
> From: cyuczie...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index
> 
> I did a quick check of what you said
> org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbCommand.writeToFile(LogBuffer)
>  char[] indexName = indexId.indexName.toCharArray();
>  buffer.putInt( indexName.length );
>  buffer.put( indexName );
> 
> I'm probably missing something but on my side it looks like it writes length
> then indexName (and I didn't update from github, just in case you've already
> fixed this)
> 
> Either way, my impression of what was happening is that some files got
> deleted, except some ie. the log, which were still open/in use, and maybe
> when recovery was tried, either it couldn't be opened, or due to being
> opened contained impartial data, or all was well but recovery couldn't
> happen because the log needed some other files or a previous database
> snapshot upon which to apply the recovered transactions
> 
> I only get that messages.log being unable to delete when I allow the test
> testFindCreatedIndex() to run, I cannot yet figure out who creates that file
> and to make sure it's being closed
> 
> John.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Niels Hoogeveen <pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> > wrote:
> 
> >
> > The problem is indeed related to not properly closing the bdb database, and
> > that is triggers another problem. In BerkeleyDbCommand data is being stored
> > into the transaction log and been read from the transaction log later on.
> > Something goes wrong making the indexName being retrieved from the
> > transaction log look like garbage.
> > I think I have located the problem. In the method
> > BerkeleyDbCommand#writeToFile the sequence of elements written to the buffer
> > is different from the order in which the method
> > BerkeleyDbCommand#readCommand reads those elements. The
> > BerkeleyDbCommand#writeToFile method cannot be correct, because it first
> > writes the indexName and then its length. It should of course first write
> > the length and then the indexName.
> > Niels
> > > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:51:40 +0200
> > > From: cyuczie...@gmail.com
> > > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index
> > >
> > > found out that I don't need to call index.delete() all the time, instead
> > > BerkeleyDbDataSource.close() aka XaDataSource.close() should do what
> > > index.delete() does, namely closing all databases (related to this
> > > datasource) and their bdb environment; so I do just that.
> > >
> > > Therefore I answer some parts I asked before.
> > >
> > > And that logical.log.1 seems to be a part of XA Transactions and I must
> > find
> > > a way to see that it's closed or something
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:15 PM, John cyuczieekc <cyuczie...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > in TestBerkeley.java
> > > > So far I've found that, bdb environment(and relevant databases) is(are)
> > > > only closed when index.delete() is called
> > > > and that can only be called when the current transaction is finished
> > (else
> > > > it will complain that some bdb databases are not opened on txn commit)
> > > >    Applying all those changes, the following file is still in use (due
> > to
> > > > cannot be deleted):
> > > >
> > > > E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\neo4j-db\logical.log.1
> > > > This seems to be part of neo4j, though I am not sure why would it still
> > be
> > > > in use even after graphDb.shutdown()
> > > > Any ideas why that would be still in use? Is graphDb.shutdown()
> > blocking
> > > > until everything is closed? or are there still threads left keeping
> > files
> > > > locked? or shutdown is delegated to other threads which may still be
> > doing
> > > > their work when .shutdown() returns ?
> > > >
> > > > By looking at some testcases in neo4j, I see that *index.delete() can
> > be
> > > > called before transaction finished, is this correct* ? anyone?
> > > > ie.
> > > >  beginTx();
> > > >         index = graphDb.index().forNodes( INDEX_NAME );
> > > >         index.delete();
> > > >         restartTx();
> > > > where
> > > >  void restartTx()
> > > >     {
> > > >         finishTx( true );
> > > >         beginTx();
> > > >     }
> > > >
> > > > in this case, if that's true that index.delete() should not cause the
> > txn
> > > > commit to fail, then this needs to be fixed in bdb-index
> > > >
> > > > Also,* is neo4j closing the indexes* somehow when graphDb.shutdown() ?
> > it
> > > > seems to me the only close would be index.delete() and neo4j isn't
> > closing
> > > > them, thus leaving the bdb Environment still open, thus tests that
> > require
> > > > shutdown and reopen of graphdb will fail since bdb wasn't itself
> > shutdown
> > > > and reopened but was left still open.
> > > > Maybe closing the indexes is left to the user then? it's fine with me,
> > just
> > > > so long as I know
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > disorganized John :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:06 PM, John cyuczieekc <cyuczie...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> looks like before delving too deep, I found that attempting to
> > deleting
> > > >> the dbPath ie. deleteFileOrDirectory( dbPath );
> > > >> fails, right after graphDB.shutdown(); - I'm excluding the possibility
> > > >> that that method is deferring the shutdown to another thread and thus
> > is
> > > >> non-blocking (due to my timing of it from previous tests looks like it
> > takes
> > > >> at most 3 sec)
> > > >>
> > > >> ie. this file cannot be deleted (likely's already in use):
> > > >>
> > E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\neo4j-db\index\bdb\Node\fast\name\je.info.0
> > > >> I need to check if and how bdb gets shutdown also, it kind of looks
> > like
> > > >> it doesn't
> > > >> So since that file doesn't get deleted, but probably others do, maybe
> > that
> > > >> is why we get those weird errors:
> > > >>
> > > >> Jul 30, 2011 9:04:11 PM
> > > >> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog
> > > >> doInternalRecovery
> > > >> INFO: Non clean shutdown detected on log
> > > >> [E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\neo4j-db/logical.log.1]. Recovery
> > > >> started ...
> > > >> java.lang.RuntimeException:
> > com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException:
> > > >> (JE 4.1.10) Problem creating output files in:
> > > >> E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\neo4j-db\index\bdb\Node\
> > \name/
> > > >> je.info UNEXPECTED_EXCEPTION: Unexpected internal Exception, may have
> > > >> side effects.
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbDataSource.createDB(BerkeleyDbDataSource.java:377)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbDataSource.getDatabase(BerkeleyDbDataSource.java:278)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleydbTransaction.doCommit(BerkeleyDbTransaction.java:191)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaTransaction.commit(XaTransaction.java:319)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaResourceManager.injectOnePhaseCommit(XaResourceManager.java:366)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog.applyOnePhaseCommitEntry(XaLogicalLog.java:514)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog.applyEntry(XaLogicalLog.java:445)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog.doInternalRecovery(XaLogicalLog.java:768)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog.open(XaLogicalLog.java:253)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog.open(XaLogicalLog.java:134)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaContainer.openLogicalLog(XaContainer.java:97)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbDataSource.<init>(BerkeleyDbDataSource.java:96)
> > > >>     at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> > > >> Method)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> > > >>     at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.XaDataSourceManager.create(XaDataSourceManager.java:76)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxModule.registerDataSource(TxModule.java:175)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbIndexImplementation.<init>(BerkeleyDbIndexImplementation.java:67)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbIndexImplementation.<init>(BerkeleyDbIndexImplementation.java:58)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.BerkeleyDbIndexProvider.load(BerkeleyDbIndexProvider.java:38)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.KernelData.loadIndexImplementations(KernelData.java:146)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDbImpl$2.initializeIndexProviders(EmbeddedGraphDbImpl.java:179)
> > > >>     at
> > org.neo4j.kernel.GraphDbInstance.start(GraphDbInstance.java:159)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDbImpl.<init>(EmbeddedGraphDbImpl.java:189)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDatabase.<init>(EmbeddedGraphDatabase.java:86)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDatabase.<init>(EmbeddedGraphDatabase.java:63)
> > > >>     at
> > org.neo4j.index.bdbje.Neo4jTestCase.setUpDb(Neo4jTestCase.java:54)
> > > >>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > > >>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:27)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
> > > >>     at
> > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
> > > >>     at
> > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
> > > >>     at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
> > > >>     at
> > > >>
> > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
> > > >> Caused by: com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException: (JE 4.1.10)
> > > >> Problem creating output files in:
> > > >> E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\neo4j-db\index\bdb\Node\
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:22 PM, John cyuczieekc <
> > cyuczie...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> from my experience this kind of behaviour would happen mostly due to
> > > >>> using some static fields which are expected to be in initialized
> > state for
> > > >>> each test, or test class
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I also needed to mention that I get this error:
> > > >>> Jul 30, 2011 8:18:54 PM
> > > >>> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.xaframework.XaLogicalLog
> > > >>> doInternalRecovery
> > > >>> INFO: Non clean shutdown detected on log
> > > >>> [E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\target\var\batch/logical.log.1]. Recovery
> > started
> > > >>> ...
> > > >>> when running TestBerkeleyBatchInsert.java (all 3 tests in it) but not
> > > >>> when running only the test in which it appears namely the method
> > > >>> testFindCreatedIndex()
> > > >>>
> > > >>> some state is carried from the previous tests, even if this is just
> > the
> > > >>> database not being deleted
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll check some more, ofc
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, John cyuczieekc <
> > cyuczie...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> (ignore these, skip to the bold part: ie. search BOLD)
> > > >>>> Thanks Niels, I just tried what you said, with maven 3.0.3 it seemed
> > to
> > > >>>> do some downloading work for a while then eventually got this:
> > > >>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:
> > > >>>> Could not resolve dependencies for project
> > > >>>> org.neo4j:neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:jar:0.1-SNAPSHOT: Could not find
> > > >>>> artifact org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:1.3-SNAPSHOT in oracleReleases (
> > > >>>> http://download.oracle.com/maven) -> [Help 1]
> > > >>>> I'll try to view/edit that pom maybe I need 1.4
> > > >>>> That seems to have worked, but now I get this:
> > > >>>> [INFO] Checking licenses...
> > > >>>> [INFO] Missing header in:
> > > >>>> e:\down\13th-floor-bdb-index-fb11e38\13th-floor-bdb-in
> > > >>>> dex-fb11e38\src\test\java\org\neo4j\index\bdbje\RawBDBSpeed.java
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Total time: 1:10.949s
> > > >>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sat Jul 30 19:11:16 CEST 2011
> > > >>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 10M/156M
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > >>>> com.mycila.maven-license-plugin:maven-license-plu
> > > >>>> gin:1.9.0:check (check-licenses) on project
> > neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:
> > > >>>> Some file
> > > >>>> s do not have the expected license header -> [Help 1]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> How were you able to run mvn install ? did you have a different
> > config
> > > >>>> ie. auto ignore licenses? what about the 1.3 to 1.4 transformation,
> > did you
> > > >>>> have to manually do it? So far, using maven is more of a pain than
> > using
> > > >>>> simply eclipse and adding dependencies manually heh
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Maybe I should try maven 2, let's see...
> > > >>>> mvn -version
> > > >>>> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
> > > >>>> Java version: 1.6.0_26
> > > >>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_26\jre
> > > >>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> > > >>>> OS name: "windows 7" version: "6.1" arch: "amd64" Family: "windows"
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> With original pom with 1.3 neo4j requirement I still got error,
> > changed
> > > >>>> to 1.4
> > > >>>> then works but I get the licenses issue again:
> > > >>>> [INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: enforce-maven}]
> > > >>>> [INFO] [license:check {execution: check-licenses}]
> > > >>>> [INFO] Checking licenses...
> > > >>>> [INFO] Missing header in:
> > > >>>> e:\down\13th-floor-bdb-index-fb11e38\13th-floor-bdb-in
> > > >>>> dex-fb11e38\src\test\java\org\neo4j\index\bdbje\RawBDBSpeed.java
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Some files do not have the expected license header
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Total time: 23 seconds
> > > >>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sat Jul 30 19:19:23 CEST 2011
> > > >>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 34M/350M
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ok then, trying to fix the license for that file...
> > > >>>> also I've seen that it now work from eclipse when on pom.xml Run
> > > >>>> As->Maven install
> > > >>>> [INFO] Checking licenses...
> > > >>>> [INFO] Missing header in:
> > > >>>> E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\src\test\java\AllTests.java
> > > >>>> [INFO] Missing header in:
> > > >>>>
> > E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\src\test\java\org\neo4j\index\bdbje\RawBDBSpeed.java
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Total time: 1.578s
> > > >>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sat Jul 30 19:25:02 CEST 2011
> > > >>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 16M/154M
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > >>>> com.mycila.maven-license-plugin:maven-license-plugin:1.9.0:check
> > > >>>> (check-licenses) on project neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index: Some file
> > > >>>> s do not have the expected license header -> [Help 1]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Ok after fixing the licenses for those 2 files, running from eclipse
> > > >>>> yields:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Building neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index 0.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0-beta-1:enforce (enforce-maven)
> > @
> > > >>>> neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index ---
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>> [INFO] --- maven-license-plugin:1.9.0:check (check-licenses) @
> > > >>>> neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index ---
> > > >>>> [INFO] Checking licenses...
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>> [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.4.3:resources
> > (default-resources) @
> > > >>>> neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index ---
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api:jar:2.0.6 is
> > > >>>> missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-project:jar:2.0.6 is
> > > >>>> missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-core:jar:2.0.6 is
> > missing,
> > > >>>> no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-artifact:jar:2.0.6 is
> > > >>>> missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-settings:jar:2.0.6 is
> > > >>>> missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-model:jar:2.0.6 is
> > missing,
> > > >>>> no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-monitor:jar:2.0.6 is
> > > >>>> missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for
> > > >>>> org.apache.maven.shared:maven-filtering:jar:1.0-beta-4 is missing,
> > no
> > > >>>> dependency information available
> > > >>>> [WARNING] The POM for
> > org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-interpolation:jar:1.13
> > > >>>> is missing, no dependency information available
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [INFO] Total time: 1.780s
> > > >>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sat Jul 30 19:32:06 CEST 2011
> > > >>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 16M/154M
> > > >>>> [INFO]
> > > >>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > >>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:2.4.3:resources
> > > >>>> (default-resources) on project neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index: Executi
> > > >>>> on default-resources of goal
> > > >>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:2.4.3:resources
> > failed:
> > > >>>> Plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:2.4.
> > > >>>> 3 or one of its dependencies could not be resolved: The following
> > > >>>> artifacts could not be resolved:
> > > >>>> org.apache.maven.shared:maven-filtering:jar:1.0-beta-4, org.c
> > > >>>> odehaus.plexus:plexus-interpolation:jar:1.13: The repository system
> > is
> > > >>>> offline but the artifact
> > > >>>> org.apache.maven.shared:maven-filtering:jar:1.0-beta-4 is not av
> > > >>>> ailable in the local repository. -> [Help 1]
> > > >>>> [ERROR]
> > > >>>> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> > the
> > > >>>> -e switch.
> > > >>>> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
> > logging.
> > > >>>> [ERROR]
> > > >>>> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> > solutions,
> > > >>>> please read the following articles:
> > > >>>> [ERROR] [Help 1]
> > > >>>>
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginResolutionException
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> *BOLD *part :)
> > > >>>> Running from command line, but on a just now downloaded zip file(as
> > you
> > > >>>> said),
> > > >>>> it works (thus my eclipse maven still needs some work, ie. maybe
> > allow
> > > >>>> it internet access even though it's on ask in firewall)
> > > >>>> I mean I do see those errors that you said you're seeing... can't
> > really
> > > >>>> paste them here from terminal they will be broken with 80 chars per
> > line
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> In eclipse without maven, running AllTests, although the tests do
> > pass,
> > > >>>> I failed to see that (possibly) the same exception(s) thrown by
> > maven
> > > >>>> install, are happening on console. But not when tests are run each
> > > >>>> individually. So, your errors happen both with mvn install and
> > AllTests
> > > >>>> (which runs them both one after the other, too). So that was a
> > failure to
> > > >>>> notice on my part :) that counting from 0 to 100 on console must've
> > moved up
> > > >>>> the exceptions and since tests were all success, I didn't scroll up.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Trying to fix,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Niels Hoogeveen <
> > > >>>> pd_aficion...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I use the download option on Github expand the zip in a directory
> > and
> > > >>>>> run mvn install in that directory without any problems.
> > > >>>>> Niels
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:39:15 +0200
> > > >>>>> > From: cyuczie...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > "When running the mvn install, both tests are ran after another."
> > > >>>>> > Since I didn't use mvn (xD) I ran the tests manually one by one,
> > but
> > > >>>>> what
> > > >>>>> > you say makes sense, it's likely the tests fail when ran one
> > after
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>> > other, I'll see what happens with an @Suite
> > > >>>>> > since there are only 2 junit tests, with @Suite they work
> > > >>>>> > Let's see if I could run mvn install (btw, avoided mvn so far
> > because
> > > >>>>> I
> > > >>>>> > cannot install the git plugin for some reason and that other
> > error I
> > > >>>>> get)
> > > >>>>> > Looks like I still need to find out how to fix this error:
> > > >>>>> > [ERROR]   The project
> > > >>>>> org.neo4j:neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:0.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > >>>>> > (E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\pom.xml) has 1 error
> > > >>>>> > [ERROR]     Non-resolvable parent POM: The repository system is
> > > >>>>> offline but
> > > >>>>> > the artifact org.neo4j:parent-central:pom:18 is not available in
> > the
> > > >>>>> local
> > > >>>>> > repository. and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @
> > > >>>>> line 3,
> > > >>>>> > column 11 -> [Help 2]
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > before I could do anything with maven...
> > > >>>>> > I'll skip trying to make maven to work for me for now, don't feel
> > > >>>>> like it :)
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > *I'm not qualified to fix this with maven, sorry*
> > > >>>>> > John
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Niels Hoogeveen
> > > >>>>> > <pd_aficion...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > >
> > > >>>>> > > Hi John,
> > > >>>>> > > Thanks for looking into this.
> > > >>>>> > > I am still seeing the same error I had before. When running the
> > mvn
> > > >>>>> > > install, both tests are ran after another. For some reason the
> > > >>>>> transaction
> > > >>>>> > > log sees an unclean shutdown and tries to commit pending
> > > >>>>> transactions.
> > > >>>>> > > During that process the index names of the bdb indexes are
> > being
> > > >>>>> retrieved
> > > >>>>> > > from binary storage. Here something goes wrong, because the
> > index
> > > >>>>> name
> > > >>>>> > > returned is garbage, so the recovery process fails because it
> > can't
> > > >>>>> find the
> > > >>>>> > > right index files.
> > > >>>>> > > Niels
> > > >>>>> > >
> > > >>>>> > > > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:48:43 +0200
> > > >>>>> > > > From: cyuczie...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> > > > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index
> > > >>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > I forked and "fixed", the tests are all working now:
> > > >>>>> > > > https://github.com/13th-floor/bdb-index
> > > >>>>> > > > Let me know if you want me to do a pull request, ... sadly I
> > > >>>>> applied
> > > >>>>> > > > formatting on RawBDBSpeed and the diff doesn't look pretty if
> > > >>>>> you're
> > > >>>>> > > trying
> > > >>>>> > > > to see what changed
> > > >>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > John.
> > > >>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Niels Hoogeveen
> > > >>>>> > > > <pd_aficion...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > > Trying to find something useful to hide the implementation
> > book
> > > >>>>> keeping
> > > >>>>> > > of
> > > >>>>> > > > > Enhanced API, I tried out dbd-index as can be found here:
> > > >>>>> > > > > https://github.com/peterneubauer/bdb-index
> > > >>>>> > > > > It looks interesting, but fails its tests. When recovering
> > it
> > > >>>>> performs
> > > >>>>> > > > > BerkeleyDbCommand#readCommand from the log. The retrieved
> > > >>>>> indexName is
> > > >>>>> > > not
> > > >>>>> > > > > actually garbage. I would like to help make this component
> > > >>>>> workable,
> > > >>>>> > > but
> > > >>>>> > > > > area of the database is a bit beyond the scope that I know.
> > > >>>>> > > > > I know this is completely unsupported software, but can
> > someone
> > > >>>>> give me
> > > >>>>> > > > > some pointers on how to fix this issue?
> > > >>>>> > > > > Niels
> > > >>>>> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> > > > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > >>>>> > > > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >>>>> > > > >
> > > >>>>> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> > > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > >>>>> > > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >>>>> > >
> > > >>>>> > > _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > >>>>> > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >>>>> > >
> > > >>>>> > _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> > Neo4j mailing list
> > > >>>>> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> Neo4j mailing list
> > > >>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > >>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

                                          
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to