Yes Josh, that should be true. I could probably create a testcase demonstrating this?
Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:20 AM, jadell <josh.ad...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't use traversals that much, and I'm trying to help another user. The > docs are a bit ambiguous, so I want to make sure I have this correct. When > using a traversal via REST, for the prune_evaluator, I can do this: > > "prune_evaluator": { > "language" : "builtin", > "name" : "none" > } > > or I can do this: > > "prune_evaluator": { > "language" : "javascript", > "body" : "...some javascript here..." > } > > In other words, when using a builtin, I give a "name" attribute, and when > using another language I give a "body" attribute. > > And I'm assuming the same holds true for return_filter as well? > > Thanks > > -- Josh Adell > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Traversal-REST-body-language-tp3331584p3331584.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
