Hey,
That will probably give you unwanted behavior as aggregate is a greedy step. If
you just want to lazily store and not aggregate then:
Gremlin 1.3: sideEffect{x.add(it)}
Gremlin 1.4: store(x)
HTH,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Dec 3, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Romiko Derbynew <romiko.derby...@readify.net> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to complete question. So I use a
> x=[];g.v(0).out.copySplit(_().out.aggregate(x),
> _().out).fairMerge().out.retain(x). I guess this is not possible, where a
> retain clause is used after a fairMerge()?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
> Behalf Of Romiko Derbynew
> Sent: Sunday, 4 December 2011 2:38 PM
> To: Neo4j user discussions (user@lists.neo4j.org)
> Subject: [Neo4j] Aggregates inside copySplit()
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use aggregates within a copySplit pipe?
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
