Hi Marko, Indeed, I think I get it now, in what scenarios would you use a non greedy collection and how would you know when that collection has be filled, I guess you would not want to query a collection that is still busy filling up in the background?
-----Original Message----- From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Marko Rodriguez Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 2:32 AM To: Neo4j user discussions Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Aggregates inside copySplit() Hi, > I had to use Aggregate here, instead of Store(), else the Except does not > work. The except() does work, but you have you understand how it works with respects to the semantics of aggregate() and store(). store = lazily store objects in the pipeline to some collection x aggregate = greedily aggregate objects in the pipeline to some collection x before moving onto the next step. So, except's excepted collection will be growing over time. However, with aggregate(), its collection is stable as it has already been greedily filled. Get it? > I am not sure if I can call _() an identityPipe, any inspiration here? You mean between the two as()? Why not? Enjoy, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
