Sure, the only disadvantage of not using Nexus would be the
incremental updates, and incremental download features that will be
provided by Nexus. If you just want to index the whole repository all
the time then just use the indexer, or produce the whole index again.
So in short there's no real advantage in re-doing the code to produce
the same index, just hook up the indexer or use Nexus if you want real
integration with m2eclipse.
On 19-Mar-08, at 9:30 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
From archiva list :
On 19/03/2008, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assuming it's a Lucene index, it should be straightforward to create
this format - we actually previously had in place a generator for
very
old versions of m2eclipse. I haven't looked at the index myself.
On 19/03/2008, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After a quick look with Luke, it appears the format is the same as it
has always been, with a couple of additions that appear to be unused
on the central repository. So the old code from Archiva 0.9 could
just
be re-added to serve this
.
2008/3/19, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The indexer component is meant to index your remote repositories. The
m2eclipse will index your local repository.
It doesn't matter what you have or run on your remote repositories.
You can just use the indexer and then it integrates with m2e. It's
the
same indexing component we use inside Nexus. So in the future you can
use the indexer with anything else, or just use Nexus.
On 19-Mar-08, at 3:40 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
i guess it is indexing from different point of views.
MavenIndexer is
doing this on your local repository, archiva is indexing on non-
local
repository (central/remote etc.).
mavenindexer could also index remote repositories, that's why it's
very interesting for me have it indexing my company archiva
repository
.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing.
-— Alan Perlis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A language that doesn’t affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing.
-— Alan Perlis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
