Yeah... a good alternative is to use the random projection stuff. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah-ha. That's clicked now. Especially as I read the comments and see it > already says exactly this. > > And I understand that you just compute extra eigenvectors then throw out > near-duplicates, or those that are too un-eigenvector -- are there good > pointers on the alternatives for that, or are alternatives impractical? I > understand it's possible to re-figure the vectors it produces at each > iteration to be orthogonal, but don't know whether that's considered > unhelpful. >
