Ted, The mr v1 option is absolutely viable. It's just question of how long a project wants to rely on a legacy tail, and that's everyone's individual lookout naturally.
Downpour style will help, as you say and surely know better than me; I should think about that for my situation. Thanks! On Aug 14, 2013 12:37 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Honest feedback is always welcome on this mailing list. Don't ever worry > about flames for that. > > Don't forget that mr v1 is an option with hadoop 2. Confusing as that may > be. > > Iterative algos are, as you say, very important. My current inclination > is to lean toward a downpour style of implementation. That fits well with > yarn but it also actually fits reasonably with mr v1. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 13, 2013, at 20:13, Carlos Mundi <cmu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Anyway, I apologize if anyone takes offense. None is meant, so please > > flame me off-list if you must. But since I self-identify as a member of > > the "small demand" set Ted Dunning describes, I figure I can chime in. > As > > always, YMMV. >
