(1) diligently answer inqueries about method use and theoretical foundation on the user list (2) fix arising issues related to that stuff, diligently as well.
when (1) and (2) stops happening, the method gets axed in a year or couple releases (which what pretty much happend this time i think). You think you'd be able to subscribe for that for the next few years? On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Qinghao Dai <rogerda...@gmail.com> wrote: > May I ask what is the qualification to be the maintainer? > I have read this part of code, and would like to have a try. > > Best Regards, > Qinghao > > > 2014/1/20 Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I was asked this question too and I had no clear answer. May be it > wasn't > > > right to remove FP from the codebase. > > > > > > > The major problem was that we had no maintainers for the code. > > >
