ok

On 3/12/14, 9:58 AM, "Andrew Musselman" <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Thanks Scott; please just attach your work to an issue in the Jira
>system; if there's not one already you could file a new issue.
>
>> On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:44 AM, "Scott C. Cote" <scottcc...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> I’ll make it work.
>> Don’t know markdown (assume some reduced mark”up” language) - but I’ll
>> figure it out.  I will assume that I can check with my consulting buddy
>> “Google” and find it. :)
>> 
>> Thank you for your contributions - glad that I can give “something”
>>back.
>> I’ll start off by sending the doc to one of the committers, and then if
>> you guys like my work, then we can proceed from there ….
>> 
>> SCott
>> 
>>> On 3/12/14, 9:38 AM, "Sebastian Schelter" <s...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Scott,
>>> 
>>> The cms behind the website uses markdown. So ideally you would attach a
>>> textfile with markdown formattings to a jira issue and a committer will
>>> put that into the website.
>>> 
>>> Does that work for you?
>>> 
>>> PS: There are a lot of online markdown editors out there.
>>> 
>>>> On 03/12/2014 03:27 PM, Scott C. Cote wrote:
>>>> I took the tour of the text analysis and pushed through despite the
>>>> problems on the page.  Commiters helped me over the hump where others
>>>> might have just gave up (to your point).
>>>> When I did it, I made shell scripts so that my steps would be
>>>>repeatable
>>>> with an anticipation of updating the page.
>>>> 
>>>> Unforunately, I gave up on trying to figure out how to update the page
>>>> (there were links indicating that I could do it), and I didn¹t want to
>>>> appear to be stupid asking how to update the documentation (my bad -
>>>>not
>>>> anyone else).  Now I know that it was not possible unless I was a
>>>> commiter.
>>>> 
>>>> Who should I send my scripts to, or how should I proceed with a
>>>>current
>>>> form of the page?
>>>> 
>>>> SCott
>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/12/14, 5:02 AM, "Sebastian Schelter" <s...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Pavan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Awesome that you're willing to help. The documentation are the pages
>>>>> listed under "Clustering" in the navigation bar under
>>>>>mahout.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you start working on one of the pages listed there (e.g. the
>>>>>k-Means
>>>>> doc), please created jira ticket in our issue tracker with a title
>>>>> along
>>>>> the lines of "Cleaning up the documentation for k-Means on the
>>>>> website".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Put a list of errors and corrections into the jira and I (or some
>>>>>other
>>>>> committer) will make sure to fix the website.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 03/12/2014 08:48 AM, Pavan Kumar N wrote:
>>>>>> i ll help with clustering algorithms documentation. do send me old
>>>>>> documentation and i will check and remove errors.  or better let me
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> how to proceed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Pavan
>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2014 12:35 PM, "Sebastian Schelter" <s...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As you've probably noticed, I've put in a lot of effort over the
>>>>>>>last
>>>>>>> days
>>>>>>> to kickstart cleaning up our website. I've thrown out a lot of
>>>>>>>stuff
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> have been startled by the amout of outdated and incorrect
>>>>>>>information
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> our website, as well as links pointing to nowhere.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think our lack of documentation makes it superhard to use Mahout
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> people. A crucial next step is to clean up the documentation on
>>>>>>> classification and clustering. I cannot do this alone, because I
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> the time and I'm not so familiar with the background of the
>>>>>>> algorithms.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I need volunteers to go through all the pages under
>>>>>>>"Classification"
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> "Clustering" on the website. For the algorithms, the content and
>>>>>>> claims of
>>>>>>> the articles need to be checked, for the examples we need to make
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> everything still works as described. It would also be great to move
>>>>>>> articles from personal blogs to our website.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Imagine that some developer wants to try out Mahout and takes one
>>>>>>> hour
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> that in the evening. She will go to our website, download Mahout,
>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> description of an algorithm and try to run an example. In the
>>>>>>>current
>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>> of the documentation, I'm afraid that most people will walk away
>>>>>>> frustrated, because the website does not help them as it should.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> PS: I will make my standpoint on whether Mahout should do a 1.0
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> depend on whether we manage to clean up and maintain our
>>>>>>> documentation.
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to