For my team it has usually been hetereoscedasticity and time inhomogeneity.




On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Tevfik Aytekin
<tevfik.ayte...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Interesting topic,
> Ted, can you give examples of those mathematical assumptions
> under-pinning ALS which are violated by the real world?
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How can there be any other practical method?  Essentially all of the
> > mathematical assumptions under-pinning ALS are violated by the real
> world.
> >  Why would any mathematical consideration of the number of features be
> much
> > more than heuristic?
> >
> > That said, you can make an information content argument.  You can also
> make
> > the argument that if you take too many features, it doesn't much hurt so
> > you should always take as many as you can compute.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Sebastian Schelter <s...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> does anyone know of a principled approach of choosing the number of
> >> features for ALS (other than cross-validation?)
> >>
> >> --sebastian
> >>
>



-- 


https://github.com/bearrito
@deepbearrito

Reply via email to