I didn't mean to veto- I thought we were on release rules. (at least three positives and more positives than negatives).
If we're treating this as code modification (any -1 stops it dead) then I'm somewhere in the ball park of -.75. Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo http://trevorgrant.org *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > ok, the contest is cancelled > > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'll revise to -1. Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent. > None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth > displacing blue man (dated though he may be, has good recognition). > > ^^ Assuming it take 3 votes to pass either way? > > Trevor Grant > Data Scientist > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > http://trevorgrant.org > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. > > > > The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1 > > > > > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed > > any spark (to me). > > > > I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negative > feedback. > > But there it is. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > wrote: > > > >> Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is welcome input) or > >> would you like to discontinue the contest. If the later, -1 now. > >> > >> > >> On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > > wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth > >>> paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations > >>> appreciated) but don’t want to unless people think it will lead to > >>> something. For me there are a couple I wouldn’t mind seeing on the web > >> site > >>> or swag and yes we do have time to try something completely different, > >> and > >>> the designers will be more willing since there is a guaranteed payout. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Musselman < > >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I thought we were just voting on continuing this process :) > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Grant < > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com > >> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Also Pat, thank you for organizing. > >>>> > >>>> +0 > >>>> > >>>> I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to > >> -1 > >>>> > >>>> Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Python, Numpy (a > >>> Python > >>>> Library), or IBM's DSX. However, I realize a big part of that is the > >>>> colors chosen. > >>>> > >>>> #143 is my favorite (possibly because it reminds me of none of the > >>> above). > >>>> But possibly if this goes to next round we can have them adjust hues / > >>>> colors. > >>>> > >>>> Trevor Grant > >>>> Data Scientist > >>>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo > >>>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > >>>> http://trevorgrant.org > >>>> > >>>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." > -Virgil* > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Musselman < > >>>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 to continue; thanks for organizing this Pat! > >>>>> > >>>>> My personal favorite is #38 > >>>>> https://images-platform.99static.com/I9quDzcBrtJXg_ > >>>> NMaIsH6ySQ7Ok=/filters: > >>>>> quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/84/84017/ > >>> attachment_84017937 > >>>>> > >>>>> I like the stylized and simple "M" and it reminds me of diagrams > >> showing > >>>>> vector multiplication. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> We can treat this like a release vote, if anyone hates all these and > >>>>>> doesn’t want to continue with shortlisted designers for 3 more days > >>>> (the > >>>>>> next step) vote -1 and say if your vote is binding (your are a PMC > >>>>> member) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Otherwise all are welcome to rate everything on the polls below. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In this case you have 24 hours to vote > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here’s my +1 to continue refining. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is a second group, hopefully picked to be unique. > >>>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/vl7xed > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We got a lot of responses, these 2 polls contain the best afaict. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We asked for something “mathy” and asked for no elephant and rider. > > We > >>>>>> have the rest of the week to tweak so leave comments about what you > >>>> like > >>>>> or > >>>>>> would like to change. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We don’t have to pick one of these, so if you hate them all, make > > that > >>>>>> known too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
