Also +1 for CCAAT and -1 for the rename. The "minion" naming convention seems a little gimmicky to me. Master/Slave pretty accurately describes exactly what's going on in the case of Mesos. You could argue that in something like MySQL leader/follower makes more sense because it is following along... though that doesn't really apply here.
On Tuesday, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:13 pm, CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com>, wrote: On 06/01/2015 04:18 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > There has been much discussion about finding a less offensive name than > "Slave", and many of these thoughts have been captured in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 I find political correctness rather nausiating. Folks should stop trying to apologies for what others did, often hundreds of years ago. I was not part of that. The advanced education system, the political system and the current wealth control systems around the globe, are in fact and indeed "Master-Slave" relationships; so why cleanse this notion prematurely? Master-slave has a rich history in the entire field of compuatational resources and electronics. That usage has nothing to do with social conventions and failings of the past. So, if you want to do something effective for those of us less fortunate, why not use terms like > I would like to open up the discussion on this topic for one week, and > if we cannot arrive at a lazy consensus, I will draft a proposal from > the discussion and call for a VOTE. > Here are the questions I would like us to answer: > 1. What should we call the "Mesos Slave" node/host/machine? > 2. What should we call the "mesos-slave" process (could be the same)? Elite-taxpayer or Lawyer-citizen or Billionare-wager or Professor-debtor ? Something more apropo? > 3. Do we need to rename Mesos Master too? The concept of a master has been around ever since (2) males or more graced this planet (your theories of soccial evilutoin may vary but they are irrelevant). Commander? General ? Generalisimo? Master_Chief Warlord? Why not get rid of the entire Apache evironment why you are at it? This line of reasoning is nothing but *STUPID* You cannot errase the history of the warrior existence of mankind. Nor should any today apologize for historical convention. WE did not commit any bad deeds before we were born, so just get over it! > Another topic worth discussing is the deprecation process, but we don't > necessarily need to decide on that at the same time as deciding the new > name(s). > 4. How will we phase in the new name and phase out the old name? > > Please voice your thoughts and opinions below. > > Thanks! > -Adam- > > P.S. My personal thoughts: > 1. Mesos Worker [Node] > 2. Mesos Worker or Agent > 3. No > 4. Carefully This is the sadest thread I have ever read. James
