thanks for the explanation.
what I mean is how to prevent two slaves from using the same cpu at the
same time?
Apparently if we launch two slave instances, they should have
distinct(non-overlapped) cpu/mem resources
to report back to master. How does current code to archive this
functionality?
On 2016/1/12 21:03, Klaus Ma wrote:
The resources of slave can be defined by "--resources"; but can not
define 50% cpu by default. There's a module in Agent to report how many
resources can be used by current slave.
For this case, "--resources" is enough for him :).
----
Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
+86-10-8245 4084 | klaus1982...@gmail.com
<mailto:klaus1982...@gmail.com> | http://k82.me
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com
<mailto:fan...@intel.com>> wrote:
How to make slave_a to use first half of cpu/memory and slave_b use
the rest of it?
On 2016/1/12 20:54, haosdent wrote:
Yes, need use different work_dir and port.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com
<mailto:fan...@intel.com>
<mailto:fan...@intel.com <mailto:fan...@intel.com>>> wrote:
Just my 2 cents.
I guess the spew is caused by the same work_dir.
Even with two different work_dir, how does cpu/mem
resources are
partitioned for two slave instances?
I'm not aware how current resources parsing logic support this(
probably not).
but why not use slave docker image to do the resource
partition?
that's what docker meant to be here.
On 2016/1/12 19:58, Shiyao Ma wrote:
Hi,
When trying starting two slaves on a single host, I
encoutered
with the
following error:
paste: http://sprunge.us/bLKb
Apparently, the second slave was *mis-understood* as the
recovery of the
first.
The slaves are configured identically other than the ports.
Regards.
--
吾輩は猫である。ホームーページはhttps://introo.me
<http://introo.me>。
--
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang
