>what I mean is how to prevent two slaves from using the same cpu at the
same time?
I think this is handled by container. Different contains would try to use
different resources.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com> wrote:

> thanks for the explanation.
> what I mean is how to prevent two slaves from using the same cpu at the
> same time?
>
> Apparently if we launch two slave instances, they should have
> distinct(non-overlapped) cpu/mem resources
> to report back to master. How does current code to archive this
> functionality?
>
>
> On 2016/1/12 21:03, Klaus Ma wrote:
>
>> The resources of slave can be defined by "--resources"; but can not
>> define 50% cpu by default. There's a module in Agent to report how many
>> resources can be used by current slave.
>>
>> For this case, "--resources" is enough for him :).
>>
>> ----
>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
>> +86-10-8245 4084 | klaus1982...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:klaus1982...@gmail.com> | http://k82.me
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com
>> <mailto:fan...@intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     How to make slave_a to use first half of cpu/memory and slave_b use
>>     the rest of it?
>>
>>
>>     On 2016/1/12 20:54, haosdent wrote:
>>
>>         Yes, need use different work_dir and port.
>>
>>         On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com
>>         <mailto:fan...@intel.com>
>>         <mailto:fan...@intel.com <mailto:fan...@intel.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>              Just my 2 cents.
>>
>>              I guess the spew is caused by the same work_dir.
>>              Even with two different work_dir, how does cpu/mem
>>         resources are
>>              partitioned for two slave instances?
>>              I'm not aware how current resources parsing logic support
>> this(
>>              probably not).
>>              but why not use slave docker image to do the resource
>>         partition?
>>              that's what docker meant to be here.
>>
>>              On 2016/1/12 19:58, Shiyao Ma wrote:
>>
>>                  Hi,
>>
>>                  When trying starting two slaves on a single host, I
>>         encoutered
>>                  with the
>>                  following error:
>>
>>                  paste: http://sprunge.us/bLKb
>>
>>                  Apparently, the second slave was *mis-understood* as the
>>                  recovery of the
>>                  first.
>>
>>                  The slaves are configured identically other than the
>> ports.
>>
>>
>>                  Regards.
>>
>>                  --
>>
>>                  吾輩は猫である。ホームーページはhttps://introo.me
>>                  <http://introo.me>。
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         --
>>         Best Regards,
>>         Haosdent Huang
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang

Reply via email to