Frank Boehme wrote:
>
> Emiliano wrote:
>
> > So if you use
> > different databases but the same username/pass everywhere you will have
> > exactly the same number active apache handler processes as open
> > databases.
>
> No, I don't want that. To manage certain aspects of site admins, I'd
> have to edit httpd.conf and then restart apache, instead of using a nice
> web interface.
To add new sites, yes, but nothing else.
> Also site admins would be abble to mess witheach other,
> if they had the same credentials.
But that's the point -- you _don't_ give them the same credentials. In
the
same way the database root user and the midgard user can concurrently
access
the site, with neither needing each others pass. So you would have
<VirtualHost _default_:*>
Servername user1.com
MidgardDatabase user1 commonuser commonpass
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost _default_:*>
Servername user2.com
MidgardDatabase user2 commonuser commonpass
</VirtualHost>
And you would have _additional_ database credentials for user1 and user2
which would
be different from commonuser and commonpass.
> I think I should have asgard and all user sites in one db then. I will
> simply install asgard first. Let's forget about the (possibly obsolete)
> example site.
OK. As said, Asgard is an enormous improvement over the 1.2.5-inherited
admin site.
> Interestingly, the single db solutions seems to provide more separation
> between the different admins than the multi-db solution..
I don't understand exactly in what way that would be?
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
