Emiliano wrote: > Unfortunately, yes. Unless they fixed it in recent functions IE > ignored the content-type header and only looked at the 'extension' of > the URL (which has no meaning at all in an URL according to the RFC).
Yes, that's why I suggested to Bogdan that the URL that returns the PDF file must end somehow with ".pdf" -- but I wonder, if it could be a parameter, e.g., ".../stuff/nonsense/?file=myfile.pdf" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
