Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it boils down to one simple thing: Midgard manages 'pages' and > 'snippets' (that is, code) in the same way that it manages 'articles', > 'topics' and 'attachments' (that is, content). This makes for a more > consistent and robust framework, and for ackward development.
Do not forget about powerfull midgard issues like style and style elements and page elements. While snippets are "code storage" elements which are available globall for all sites from one database (if set to SG0), page elements when inherited , and style elements by default are available global for one specific site. Main difference ( and very easy BTW) is that You do not have to remember or know what is specific page element or style element parent object or path. All you have to know is its name. > We definitely need a clear option to open Midgard to the wealth of IDEs > and good text, html and image editors without having to explicitly code > an integration layer (as with PHPMole). And that usually boils down to > having stuff as... files. Plain old files. What about replication then? CVS like system? Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
