On Friday 13 April 2007 09:04, Jerome Lacoste wrote: > > My instinct is to name it after the actual JNLP name "Foo.jnlp.template", > > but there's a nagging feeling in the back of my head that says that's a > > bad idea. > > I don't use eclipse too much. In IDEA you can say *.vm and it will > only show the Velocity templates. But that assumes you know the > extension...
You can do the same in Eclispe. > > I didn't use jnlp because it was part of the directory name and i > didn't want redundancy. Now that makes me think it might have been > better as template and .vm are somewhat redundant. I will think > whether I should change it again before alpha-2. That sounds like a > valid request. > > Would src/main/jnlp/jnlp.vm be OK for you ? template and vm are redundant, but I'd prefer the generic "template" and keep the .vm "encapsulated". That is, I shouldn't care what your technology for templating is, I don't think. So I'd prefer jnlp.template, but either one is better. > > Jerome > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
