Wayne Fay wrote:
>
>> However, when I run the same test in IntelliJ (9.0.1 Ultimate), it says I
>> have 100% methods covered and 98% of lines covered. Any ideas why
>> Cobertura
>> is giving inaccurate information?
>
> Does IntelliJ use Cobertura beneath the hood, or a different code
> analyzer?
>
> If theirs is different, there may be perfectly good reasons for the
> analysis results to differ due to variances in the analysis process
> itself, right?
>
> Wayne
>
I believe IntelliJ uses a different analyzer. Below is the only thing I've
found related to Cobertura and IntelliJ.
http://old.nabble.com/Using-Cobertura-in-IntelliJ-IDEA-td15287365.html
I tried using Clover to see if Cobertura was reporting inaccurate
information and it seems to work much better.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Cobertura-Maven-Plugin-reports-lower-branch-coverage-than-IDEA-Coverage-tp28102246p28113539.html
Sent from the mojo - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
