And keep in mind that "branch coverage" and "line coverage" are two different metrics. For more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage (they are referred to in Wikipedia as "statement" and "decision" coverage resp.)
Regards, Tomas ________________________________ From: mraible <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, April 1, 2010 5:57:49 PM Subject: Re: [mojo-user] Cobertura Maven Plugin reports lower branch coverage than IDEA Coverage Wayne Fay wrote: > >> However, when I run the same test in IntelliJ (9.0.1 Ultimate), it says I >> have 100% methods covered and 98% of lines covered. Any ideas why >> Cobertura >> is giving inaccurate information? > > Does IntelliJ use Cobertura beneath the hood, or a different code > analyzer? > > If theirs is different, there may be perfectly good reasons for the > analysis results to differ due to variances in the analysis process > itself, right? > > Wayne > I believe IntelliJ uses a different analyzer. Below is the only thing I've found related to Cobertura and IntelliJ. http://old.nabble.com/Using-Cobertura-in-IntelliJ-IDEA-td15287365.html I tried using Clover to see if Cobertura was reporting inaccurate information and it seems to work much better. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Cobertura-Maven-Plugin-reports-lower-branch-coverage-than-IDEA-Coverage-tp28102246p28113539.html Sent from the mojo - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
