OK, thanks!

I suggest that configuration parameter gets changed then, since it's
misleading, to more people than just me.

Maybe a separate ticket for supporting true JVM forking. Will think about that.

Regards,
Stevo.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Have a look at this thread [1] regarding the "fork" option.
> HTH,
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> [1] 
> http://old.nabble.com/How-to-set-user.timezone-within-tomcat-maven-plugin-td31024393.html
>
> 2011/3/25 Stevo Slavić <[email protected]>:
>> Hello Codehaus Mojo Users,
>>
>> Correct me if wrong, tomcat-maven-plugin's run goal (
>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/tomcat-maven-plugin/run-mojo.html ) seems to
>> support forking, but not specifying arguments for forked JVM.
>> Something like that IMO would be useful for specifying memory options
>> different from Maven build and javaagent like jacoco for coverage.
>>
>> I couldn't find related ticket in JIRA, so I created one
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTOMCAT-83
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stevo.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to