I agree the "fork" attribute is very confusing. Maybe adding a new one with "reallyForkingJvm" :-)
-- Olivier PS : it's Friday :-) 2011/3/25 Stevo Slavić <[email protected]>: > OK, thanks! > > I suggest that configuration parameter gets changed then, since it's > misleading, to more people than just me. > > Maybe a separate ticket for supporting true JVM forking. Will think about > that. > > Regards, > Stevo. > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> Have a look at this thread [1] regarding the "fork" option. >> HTH, >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> http://twitter.com/olamy >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> [1] >> http://old.nabble.com/How-to-set-user.timezone-within-tomcat-maven-plugin-td31024393.html >> >> 2011/3/25 Stevo Slavić <[email protected]>: >>> Hello Codehaus Mojo Users, >>> >>> Correct me if wrong, tomcat-maven-plugin's run goal ( >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/tomcat-maven-plugin/run-mojo.html ) seems to >>> support forking, but not specifying arguments for forked JVM. >>> Something like that IMO would be useful for specifying memory options >>> different from Maven build and javaagent like jacoco for coverage. >>> >>> I couldn't find related ticket in JIRA, so I created one >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTOMCAT-83 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Stevo. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
