So <check-errors/> will return immediately without executing any code following it if there are any errors?
Scott Gray-2 wrote: > > The presence of error messages doesn't cause the service to return an > error, you have to do it explicitly with: > <check-errors/> > or > <return response-code="error"/> > > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 17/07/2009, at 1:35 AM, snowch wrote: > >> >> How can I get svcB to return error and to return failure? In svcB I >> am using >> the following to add an error, but it appears that is not causing >> svcA to >> rollback... >> >> <add-error><fail-message message="..."/></add-error> >> >> >> Scott Gray-2 wrote: >>> >>> It depends on what you mean by fail: >>> If svcB triggers a rollback then by default svcA will rollback, see >>> the require-new-transaction attribute >>> If svcB returns failure then svcA won't roll back >>> If svcB returns error then svcA will rollback by default, see the >>> break-on-error attribute >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> On 17/07/2009, at 12:53 AM, snowch wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If have a service (e.g. svcA) that calls another service (e.g. svcB) >>>> as per >>>> the pseudo code: >>>> >>>> svcA: >>>> 1. lookup entity >>>> 2. modify entity >>>> 3. store entity >>>> 4. call svcB >>>> 5. return >>>> >>>> If svcB fails, does step 3 rollback? >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/minilang-transactions-tp24515741p24515741.html >>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/minilang-transactions-tp24515741p24516505.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/minilang-transactions-tp24515741p24518337.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
