Hi Rishi, Thank you for your explanation.
So that means let say I create/change NY partyID in Party Entity from NY_DTF to NY_ABC, and changing taxAuthPartyId in TaxAuthority entitiy to NY_ABC, there should not be any issue right? (what I understood is, its just the matter of how we name partyID in Party Entity. Correct?) Thanks. su- Rishi Solanki wrote: > > Hi su2, > If you see the records in the party entity of the same party, they all are > of type PartyGroups in role of TAX_AUTHORITY. > Here the partyId field (pk in Party entity) is self explain its purpose, > The > first half is the state name and another half is the company name (not > exactly but we can say). > Now the key says that company in which state. If you see the relationship > of > the TaxAuthority then its PK is composite key of the geoId and partyId > from > the Geo and Party entity. Finally we can say that, These are the partyIds > which are doing business in particular state. > > Hope it helps !!! > > Rishi Solanki > Enterprise Software Developer > HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, su2 <shu...@pexsupply.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> In TaxAuthority Entity, I see NY_UTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN(any state >> except >> NY & CA). Why do we have 3 different names after the underscore "_" ?. >> What >> does UTF, BOE & TAXMAN stands for? >> >> Your help is really appreciated. >> >> Thank you. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/TaxAuthority-Entity-tp25024881p25024881.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/TaxAuthority-Entity-tp25024881p25026542.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
