JIRA says we have this in progress: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310500&status=3
I guess there is more. I have created the "Release Candidate Branch 10.04" version in JIRA. We could schedule issues/tasks we want to include in the relase to this JIRA version so that we all have a clear idea (and may be we could help). -Bruno 2010/3/14 Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> > Hi, > We are approaching 10.04 date range. > > How is everybody feeling? > Are we up for new release branch? > Are we interested in completing some code changes before creating release > branch? I mean if somebody has definite plans then it will not hurt to wait > a bit. > > I will love to see release branch created towards end of March or beginning > of April. > > Thanks and Regards > Anil Patel > HotWax Media Inc > Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" > > On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: > > > I think that we are all close to the same idea. > > > > Only a little bit is missing: > > what we call now "Release branch" should be renamed to "Release > > Candidate branch". > > This would mean that what is contained in that branch is somewhat that > > is going through the release process (testing, bug fixing, > > documenting, etc.) and so it is candidate to become a Release. > > > > When we are happy with the tests done on the RC branch we will tag the > > branch and create the real Release. > > The bug fixing on the RC branch can continue and when we rae happy > > again we can tag it again. > > > > What is the issue on doing this? > > Isn't it the standard way to handle releases? > > > > About releases, branches and tags names: > > I propose to use a name as "RC_10.4" for the next release candidate > branch. > > After a while when no major issues will reported on this branch the > > release can be done that is the "OFBIZ_10.4" tag can be done on the RC > > branch. > > After some bug fixes on the RC_10.4 branch we will tag it again as > > "OFBIZ_10.4.1", "OFBIZ_10.4.2", etc. > > The third number will mean that the release is actually a "mantained", > > "bug fixed", release of the 10.4. > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > -Bruno > > > > > > 2010/2/24 Matt Warnock <mwarn...@ridgecrestherbals.com>: > >> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:22 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>> Are you planning to fix them or to donate some resources (developers > and/or money) in order to fix them? Or are you asking other to do this? > >>> BTW, do you really think that commercial or open source releases are > done when companies think there are no bugs? Really? > >> > >> Well in my experience it is unusual for most software, and it isn't > >> often in Debian (once about 4 years between releases), but yes, that is > >> EXACTLY when a new Debian Stable is released. :) > >> > >> -- > >> Matt Warnock <mwarn...@ridgecrestherbals.com> > >> RidgeCrest Herbals, Inc. > >> > >> > >
