Does anyone know the status of this? --james
BJ Freeman wrote: > > I am for standalone framework. David has been working on that project > for a while, if I remember correctly. > > #2 bothers me though. The design of ofbiz was that the entity was the > controlling factor for creating DB and UI. I was one of the major > reasons I came to ofbiz. > That said, any work that wants to be done on UI integration that makes > ofbiz look classy, I think should be the focus. > A lot of work has been done in that area. > But integrating other UI interfaces that keep the design idea of the > entity being to controlling focus is what I would like to see. > > I don't see ofbiz being object oriented in the normal sense. > > I see the effort for the help files and a easily understood UI from the > user point of view being the main factors in promoting ofbiz. > > > > > Chris Snow sent the following on 2/24/2010 10:47 PM: >> Here are some benefits of a 10.04 standalone framework release: >> >> 1) Standalone framework users would be a form of quality control helping >> to ensure more incorrect dependencies don't find there way into ofbiz. >> 2) we would be able to promote the framework in its own right thus >> competing with OpenERP's OpenObject platform >> 3) a much larger potential user base than ecommerce or erp users. >> >> Any more that I have missed? >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/why-we-should-have-a-10-04-standalone-framework-release-tp1568563p2543258.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
