http://incubator.apache.org/isis/


On Tue Apr 05,2011 08:18 pm, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the entire 
> project to change the field names.
> 
> It seems to me you will be wasting a lot of time trying to make OFBiz 
> code look the way you want it to look - without adding anything new or 
> fixing anything. Instead, why not use the project in the way it was 
> intended, and spend your time getting something useful accomplished?
> 
> -Adrian
> 
> On 4/5/2011 4:13 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> > Thank you all. I understand now the reasons behind using VARCHAR.
> >
> > I found my way around this. I can just change the data type in the
> > fieldtypepostnew.xml. This way I can declare all the ids as integers,
> > and indicators as boolean instead of CHAR(1).
> >
> > However still wondering if there is a way to change the name of the ids
> > to only id without having to go through each foriegn key.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon Apr 04,2011 05:08 am, David E Jones wrote:
> >> As for naming all "id" fields just plain "id", it makes it far more 
> >> difficult to keep track of foreign keys. The nice thing about giving even 
> >> sequenced ID fields a somewhat unique name is that you can use that same 
> >> name on other entities/tables and have them match up automatically.
> >>
> >> The Entity Engine does a lot with field name mapping for relationships 
> >> between entities, and there are thousands of these in the OFBiz data 
> >> model, so the few extra characters goes a long way toward making things 
> >> easier to understand and maintain.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 03/04/2011 06:15, Mansour Al Akeel a ?crit :
> >>>> Hello all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am wondering about the reasons behind using VARCHAR for entities Id,
> >>>> instead of a numeric value with autoincrement. Another thing is the
> >>>> naming of the primary key. For example, accommodation_class has it's
> >>>> primary key as "accommodation_class_id". Wouldn't it be easier just to
> >>>> name it "id"?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Mansour,
> >>>
> >>> just go to this page : 
> >>> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Why-primary-keys-are-VAR-CHAR-type-in-OFBiz-td146555.html#a146562
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Erwan de FERRIERES
> >>> www.nereide.biz

Reply via email to