I have the same opinion. The website data are useful for theme with
tenant but not on seed data.
Nicolas
Le 02/08/2011 09:19, Hans Bakker a écrit :
I looked in the emaillist history and the only reason that came up is
the definition of the theme. (i missed that thread)
However,
most webapps are backend applications which can use the general
properties file when the website record is missing.
The reason i want it removed is that in a production environment the
website list is pretty long so it is difficult to find a website which
is really used.
Therefore my proposal to remove the website records for all back end
webapplications and the trunk front end should be demo data.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:11 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
I ask this on the Dev a few months ago, Erwan de FERRIERES told me this
is why.
I am assuming that in a tenant mode this adds more flexibility.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/1/2011 10:52 PM:
We have a default theme in general.properties so website record not
mandatory?
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:19 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
<WebSite webSiteId="MARKETING" siteName="Marketing Manager"
visualThemeSetId="BACKOFFICE"/>
Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/1/2011 8:38 PM:
We are now using the content part of the system more and more and are
wondering why every webapp has its website?
I deleted in webtools the website for accounting and everything seems to
be still working ok.
If there are no good reasons to keep it i would like to suggest to
remove all these websites except for cmssite, WebStore and WebStoreClone
and move these to the demo data.
regards,
Hans
--
Nicolas MALIN
Consultant
Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
-------
Société LibrenBerry
Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
Site : http://www.librenberry.net/
