Thanks Adrian -- we'll take a look at the latest version. 

Maybe a complete red herring -- but a couple of weeks ago our client requested 
that we change the password for the primary "admin" user. We deleted and 
re-added main scheduled jobs but we've had problems since ...

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Crum [mailto:adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:58 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities

Hmmm... it could be the job scheduler. It was refactored a few years ago to fix 
problems like that.

Try C&Ping R13 job scheduler into R10
(framework\service\src\org\ofbiz\service\job).

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 11/24/2015 8:29 AM, Nick Rosser wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Not entirely sure if it made a difference -- site was going down every now 
> and again, initially we thought that some scheduled jobs were the culprit 
> (since outages were in or around the scheduled job time). However, we had 
> problems yesterday when no scheduled jobs were running (we disabled most of 
> them for now).
>
> Site has been fine since we turned off VISIT and VISITOR tracking -- can't be 
> 100% sure that this is the resolution factor given general problems over the 
> last couple of weeks. I guess that if the site is fine for several days then 
> we would have to attribute it to the serverstats change.
>
> We've heard of problems when the JOB_SANDBOX gets very large -- ever heard 
> about instability when VISIT and VISITORS get very large? (19M and 18M rows 
> each).
>
> Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Crum [mailto:adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:13 AM
> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
>
> Did the setting change improve performance?
>
> You could write a service that deletes data older than xxx days, then make it 
> a scheduled job.
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 11/24/2015 7:48 AM, Len Shein wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We have a LIVE  application in which the VISIT AND VISITOR entities 
>> have grown to over 19 and 18 million rows respectively.
>>
>> Has anyone experienced any performance issues when these entities 
>> have grown to such capacity?
>>
>>
>>
>> We recently had a performance issue and decided to turn off the visit 
>> history feature until this feature can be ruled out as the issue.
>>
>> stats.persist.visit=false
>>
>> stats.persist.visitor=false
>>
>>
>>
>> Note: The application is currently using Ofbiz r.10.
>>
>>
>> Len Shein
>>
>>    <mailto:lsh...@solveda.com> lsh...@solveda.com
>>
>> O: 516.742.7888 x225
>>
>> O: 732.333.4303
>> C: 917.882.8515
>>
>>

Reply via email to