Hello Bhushan,

 

Did you compile OM 4.0.0 or OM 3.1.3? 

“target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar”

 

You might want to try 

Compiling OM 3.1.3 
(https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.1.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/openmeetings-server/target/apache-openmeetings-3.1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz).
  

Copy only the binary from openmeetings-server/target/apache-OM-3.1.3-*.tar.gz 
into a destination. 

Untar. 

Configure and use.

 

Thank you.

 

Sincerely,

 

Hemant K. Sabat

 

Coscend Communications Solutions

Web site: www.Coscend.com <http://www.coscend.com/>  

------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages 
from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at: 
http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html 

 

 

 

 

From: Bhushan Patil [mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 9:59 AM
To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Get Openmeetings version via SOAP/REST api

 

Hi Maxim, I copied all target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar from compiled 
build to OM 3.1.2/webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib directory and started that 
server.
But I am not getting wsdl for InfoWebService 
(http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl)

Getting this in logs
ID: 2
Address: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl
Http-Method: GET
Content-Type: 
Headers: 
{Accept=[text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8], 
accept-encoding=[gzip, deflate], accept-language=[en-US,en;q=0.5], 
connection=[keep-alive], Content-Type=[null], 
cookie=[JSESSIONID=AA8EE59C188C596371952A44DA15ED5B; 
__utma=111872281.809229259.1457255279.1463000462.1464369151.7; 
__utmz=111872281.1457255279.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); 
__hstc=181257784.b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b.1464369152828.1464369152828.1464369152828.1;
 
hsfirstvisit=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2Fservice%2Flocal%2Foutreach%2Fwelcome%2F%3Fversion%3D2.12.0-01%26versionMm%3D2.12%26edition%3DOSS%26usertype%3Danonymous|http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2F|1464369152825;
 hubspotutk=b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b], host=[localhost:5080], 
upgrade-insecure-requests=[1], user-agent=[Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux 
i686; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0]}
--------------------------------------
DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.845 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88289 305 
org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] - 
Invoking handleMessage on interceptor 
org.apache.cxf.transport.https.CertConstraintsInterceptor@27bc8a 
<mailto:org.apache.cxf.transport.https.CertConstraintsInterceptor@27bc8a> 
DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.846 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88290 305 
org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] - 
Invoking handleMessage on interceptor 
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor@1278a8c 
<mailto:org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor@1278a8c> 
[WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] 
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor - No root resource matching 
request path /openmeetings/services/InfoWebService has been found, Relative 
Path: /InfoWebService. Please enable FINE/TRACE log level for more details.
[WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] 
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.WebApplicationExceptionMapper - 
javax.ws.rs.NotFoundException: HTTP 404 Not Found

On Aug 19, 2016 12:59 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com 
<mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> OK, implemented, you can test it using fresh nightly build
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>
>> ok :)
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>>
>>> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can retrieve 
>>> particular info from key instead of index.
>>>
>>> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > yep it is OK :)
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > how would you like to get revision and build date?
>>> > as Object with fields
>>> > {
>>> >   version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT,
>>> >   revision: xxxxxxxxxx,
>>> >   buildDate: 2016-08-19
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > as (list of Strings)
>>> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"]
>>> >
>>> > via additional method(s) ?
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>>> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is 
>>> >> correctly done?
>>> >>
>>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Service is ready to be committed :)
>>> >> > waiting for the issue :)))
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Do you need only version? 
>>> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved
>>> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also 
>>> >> >> provided revision n buildDate.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
>>> >> >> > <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue?
>>> >> >> Yes, I will create it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> >> >> <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > 
>>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers ....
>>> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like 
>>> >> >> >>> > InfoWebService ....
>>> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion
>>> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> >> >>> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > 
>>> >> >> >>> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in 
>>> >> >> >>> >> 'ServerWebService' ?
>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" 
>>> >> >> >>> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for 
>>> >> >> >>> >> > this?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> >> >>> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> version is 3.1.2 then don't call getSession method, call 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> directly login method.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself ....
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :(
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> version from the links you provided.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > with ...
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :))
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> If not, please guide me how can I create one.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > work with new REST services as expected
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>  
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> compatible with this API ?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :))
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> number of requests required (2 against 3) :)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> compact :)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>  
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> idea. Especially to get a proper API document 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> out. With Swagger you can embed example request 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> and responses a lot more easy.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed"
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> signatures have changed. But the logical flow is 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> the same.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :((((
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> to REST ....
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> error, user, group, room recording etc.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> produces both XML and JSON)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> haven't added PUT)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>  
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> the change?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> same, right ?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here: 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> :(
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :)
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> version of Openmeetings with our 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> application. At the time of migration to 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> changed. We want to  keep old code as well 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> as write new code for newer APIs.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> let us know version of Openmeetings.
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >> >>> >> > -- 
>>> >> >> >>> >> > WBR
>>> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> >
>>> >> >> >>> > -- 
>>> >> >> >>> > WBR
>>> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> -- 
>>> >> >> >> WBR
>>> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > -- 
>>> >> >> > WBR
>>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -- 
>>> >> > WBR
>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -- 
>>> > WBR
>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> 
Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12842 - Release Date: 08/19/16

Reply via email to