Hi Hemant, I downloaded OM-3.1.3 from
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.1.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/openmeetings-server/target/apache-openmeetings-3.1.3-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
I extracted it then ran it. Still facing same issue. Unable to get wsdl for
InfoWebService(
http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl)

On Aug 21, 2016 12:12 AM, "Coscend@OM" <om.insig...@coscend.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Bhushan,
>
>
>
> Did you compile OM 4.0.0 or OM 3.1.3?
>
> “target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar”
>
>
>
> You might want to try
>
> Compiling OM 3.1.3 (
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.1.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/openmeetings-server/target/apache-openmeetings-3.1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
).
>
> Copy only the binary from
openmeetings-server/target/apache-OM-3.1.3-*.tar.gz into a destination.
>
> Untar.
>
> Configure and use.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Hemant K. Sabat
>
>
>
> Coscend Communications Solutions
>
> Web site: www.Coscend.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail
Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Bhushan Patil [mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 9:59 AM
> To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Get Openmeetings version via SOAP/REST api
>
>
>
> Hi Maxim, I copied all target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar from
compiled build to OM 3.1.2/webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib directory and
started that server.
> But I am not getting wsdl for InfoWebService (
http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl)
>
> Getting this in logs
> ID: 2
> Address: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl
> Http-Method: GET
> Content-Type:
> Headers:
{Accept=[text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8],
accept-encoding=[gzip, deflate], accept-language=[en-US,en;q=0.5],
connection=[keep-alive], Content-Type=[null],
cookie=[JSESSIONID=AA8EE59C188C596371952A44DA15ED5B;
__utma=111872281.809229259.1457255279.1463000462.1464369151.7;
__utmz=111872281.1457255279.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none);
__hstc=181257784.b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b.1464369152828.1464369152828.1464369152828.1;
hsfirstvisit=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2Fservice%2Flocal%2Foutreach%2Fwelcome%2F%3Fversion%3D2.12.0-01%26versionMm%3D2.12%26edition%3DOSS%26usertype%3Danonymous|http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2F|1464369152825;
hubspotutk=b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b], host=[localhost:5080],
upgrade-insecure-requests=[1], user-agent=[Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux
i686; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0]}
> --------------------------------------
> DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.845 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88289 305
org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] -
Invoking handleMessage on interceptor
org.apache.cxf.transport.https.CertConstraintsInterceptor@27bc8a
> DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.846 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88290 305
org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] -
Invoking handleMessage on interceptor
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor@1278a8c
> [WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1]
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor - No root resource
matching request path /openmeetings/services/InfoWebService has been found,
Relative Path: /InfoWebService. Please enable FINE/TRACE log level for more
details.
> [WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1]
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.WebApplicationExceptionMapper -
javax.ws.rs.NotFoundException: HTTP 404 Not Found
>
> On Aug 19, 2016 12:59 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, implemented, you can test it using fresh nightly build
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >> ok :)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can
retrieve particular info from key instead of index.
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > yep it is OK :)
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> >
> >>> > how would you like to get revision and build date?
> >>> > as Object with fields
> >>> > {
> >>> >   version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT,
> >>> >   revision: xxxxxxxxxx,
> >>> >   buildDate: 2016-08-19
> >>> > }
> >>> >
> >>> > as (list of Strings)
> >>> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"]
> >>> >
> >>> > via additional method(s) ?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is
correctly done?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Service is ready to be committed :)
> >>> >> > waiting for the issue :)))
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Do you need only version?
> >>> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved
> >>> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also
provided revision n buildDate.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue?
> >>> >> >> Yes, I will create it.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers
....
> >>> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like
InfoWebService ....
> >>> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion
> >>> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in
'ServerWebService' ?
> >>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name
for this?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation
code should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is
3.1.2 then don't call getSession method, call directly login method.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself ....
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :(
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns
OM version from the links you provided.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to
start with ...
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :))
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil <
thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM
version? If not, please guide me how can I create one.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are
updated to work with new REST services as expected
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM,
seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be
compatible with this API ?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :))
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just
reduced the number of requests required (2 against 3) :)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and
more compact :)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM,
seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really
good idea. Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you
can embed example request and responses a lot more easy.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed"
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method
signatures have changed. But the logical flow is the same.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim
Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI:
http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim
Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document
this
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise
:((((
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add
Swanger to REST ....
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim
Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple
groups error, user, group, room recording etc.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now
(and produces both XML and JSON)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I
haven't added PUT)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM,
seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the
REST (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow
are the same, right ?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim
Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed
here: http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here
http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here:
http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here:
https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much
documentation :(
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome
:)
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM,
Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated
older version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of
migration to OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to  keep
old code as well as write new code for newer APIs.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api
which let us know version of Openmeetings.
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >> > --
> >>> >> >> >>> >> > WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >> >>> > --
> >>> >> >> >>> > WBR
> >>> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> WBR
> >>> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >> > WBR
> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > --
> >>> >> > WBR
> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > WBR
> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12842 - Release Date: 08/19/16

Reply via email to