Hello Michael,

According to my tests this version:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.2.x/428/
Works much more stable, I see no errors or "blank pages" in my Moodle

Could you please check on your server?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was able to get "white page"
> It is caused by failed WebSocket connection
> Maybe you have WebSockets disabled?
> Do you have any exceptions in OM logs?
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> There should be no dashboard if you accessing room from Moodle
>> I would appreciate any steps or maybe hints on how to configure this
>> and be able to reproduce
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Michael Wuttke
>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've tested with FF and Chromium. And I enabled the OM Site in the
>>> "Cookies settings". And reloaded the page. But like Peter described the
>>> OM dashboard is empty, just the general chat is available.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Greetings,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Am 31.01.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Peter Dähn:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> probably this one?
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1538
>>>>
>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.01.2017 um 10:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>> Blank page is really weird ...
>>>>> Any JS/Cookies errors in the browser
>>>>>
>>>>> Before latest change version should be set in 2 places (build.xml and
>>>>> version.php) I see no reason to have these 2 versions, they are the
>>>>> same
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michael Wuttke
>>>>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Maxim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested now the latest master branch and it does not work with
>>>>>> moodle 3.0.8 and OM 3.2 RC1. I've got a blank page as well. I can only
>>>>>> see the general chat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And what speaks against to set the version string to the version.php
>>>>>> directly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks & Greetings,
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 31.01.2017 um 05:17 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> master branch works for me with Moodle 3.0.4
>>>>>>> I have updated README with build instructions
>>>>>>> Could you please check?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Michael Wuttke
>>>>>>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello MAxim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks for your work, but the master branch does not work now with
>>>>>>>> moodle 3.0 and OM 3.2. I've got a blank page and could only see the
>>>>>>>> general chat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And please could you set the version string to the version.php for
>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>> how work only with github as code reposistory?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks & Greetings,
>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 30.01.2017 um 14:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have updated plugin
>>>>>>>>> master branch is updated to work with OM 3.2
>>>>>>>>> Additional branch 2.7.3.2 was created
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> build was updated to automatically set version from build.xml to
>>>>>>>>> version.php (with release date)
>>>>>>>>> So now for these 2 branches version should be specified in one
>>>>>>>>> place only
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> plugin need to be updated
>>>>>>>>>> this line [1] should be modified as follows
>>>>>>>>>> -- $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/swf?&secureHash=" . $hash
>>>>>>>>>> --        . "&scopeRoomId=" . $openmeetings->om->room_id
>>>>>>>>>> --        . "&language=" . $openmeetings->om->language;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ++ $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/hash?&secure=" . $hash
>>>>>>>>>> ++        . "&language=" . $openmeetings->om->language;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll create 3.2.0 compatible version later this week
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-moodle-plugin/blob/02b378e2b99504580143a6ca2c7a3dbb9e56c021/renderer.php#L123
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Michael Wuttke
>>>>>>>>>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the upgrade works but the moodle om plugin not. It is possible
>>>>>>>>>>> to create
>>>>>>>>>>> a new room but not to enter a room. The om login page will be
>>>>>>>>>>> shown always.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Greetings,
>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure you can upgrade, the upgrade process is usual
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Backup everything
>>>>>>>>>>>> Create db
>>>>>>>>>>>> Restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Moodle plugin should work as expected
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2017 22:21, "Michael Wuttke"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Hello Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      two questions:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      - can I upgrade from OM 3.1.x to 3.2.0 or I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>> install a new/fresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>      OM installation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      - does the moodle om plugin some improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Thanks & Greetings,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Am 29.01.2017 um 08:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      > I'm going to start 3.2.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>      > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last
>>>>>>>>>>>>      minute" issues?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.1.5 will
>>>>>>>>>>>>      be the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> last 3.1.x release
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> Thanks for the report Sebastian!
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> I was able to reproduce and fix this issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> demo is updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> please let me know if anything else is broken ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Thanks Sebastian,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> I'll double-check
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> It was ok during my test, maybe will ask for the steps
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> On Jan 24, 2017 04:02, "seba.wag...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>" <seba.wag...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> good work! I have seen some
>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements/simplifications on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> User-list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Less buttons. I think that is the right approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Simpler user
>>>>>>>>>>>>      interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> But I noticed that a bit of work is required in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Audio/Video
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> settings. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> works initially, but if you try to refresh (via the
>>>>>>>>>>>> small icon
>>>>>>>>>>>>      in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> video
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> pod) or via triggering the modal/dialogue to choose
>>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>>>      device
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> settings via the user-list the video just becomes
>>>>>>>>>>>> black and nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> happens
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> anymore. Not possible to recover unless complete
>>>>>>>>>>>> refresh of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      browser.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> I think that flow requires some attention.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Audio/Video settings is
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> pretty
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> much our core functionality.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Seb
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> 2017-01-24 0:53 GMT+13:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Hi Dimitriy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> node.js for server-side js is a huge package that
>>>>>>>>>>>> need to handled
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> somehow... I also don't know if this would be the
>>>>>>>>>>>> best solution...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> webRTC browser2browser will not scale for private
>>>>>>>>>>>> user and their
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> dsl-connection. So webRTC or SIP/RTMP to a
>>>>>>>>>>>> mediaserver that then
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> multicasts
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> to all peers sounds like a way to move away from
>>>>>>>>>>>> flash... I
>>>>>>>>>>>>      think this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> already discussed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Anyway I have no experience in this area and I was
>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering
>>>>>>>>>>>>      that this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> guy
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> mentions a "simple solution".
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Dmitriy -:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Hello Peter,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> I'm working on webRTC native client that can accept
>>>>>>>>>>>> peer
>>>>>>>>>>>>      connection
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> browser.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> We already have "serverlessmedia" solution "browser
>>>>>>>>>>>> - to -
>>>>>>>>>>>>      browser"
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> our signal server in Java.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> We're moving to "peer-to-media server-to-all other
>>>>>>>>>>>> peers"
>>>>>>>>>>>>      solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Do you know this guy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> https://github.com/muaz-khan
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Yeah, I know him, and even have tried to use his
>>>>>>>>>>>> library
>>>>>>>>>>>>      recordRTC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Unfortunately, It allows to capture media stream ("live
>>>>>>>>>>>>      video") only in
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Chrome. Firefox just produces only one big chunk,
>>>>>>>>>>>> IE/Edge doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> support
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> video etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> I tried many times to use pure JavaScript solution but
>>>>>>>>>>>>      libraries not
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> for this purposes (MediaRecorder API and
>>>>>>>>>>>> MediaSources API) yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>      and also
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> stack of technology doesn't permit to use JavaScript
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the server
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Dähn
>>>>>>>>>>>> <da...@vcrp.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> I had a look around...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> I found this one...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model
>>>>>>>>>>>>      (peer-to-media
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> server-to-all other peers)."
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Do you know this guy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> https://github.com/muaz-khan
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Peter Dähn:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> I thought the same about the general roadmap
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> 1st whiteborad (there was something in gsoc, right?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> 2nd audio/video (also gsoc but not finally prototyped)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Lets have a look, if we could get some input (and
>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      from such
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> whish-list...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Wish list is good idea :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> I guess it can be created from the list of JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>      discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> My plans were to perform next steps to remove Flash
>>>>>>>>>>>> :),
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> 1) move WB to HTML5
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> 2) move Audio/Video ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> last one seems to be tricky :( no POC yet :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Dähn
>>>>>>>>>>>> <da...@vcrp.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> nothing critical, rooms are working so far...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> We will collect a few things regarding usability
>>>>>>>>>>>> and look
>>>>>>>>>>>>      and feel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Unfortunatly by now no time is left... I think we
>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>      report this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Jira...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> btw.. Is there a kind of wish-list to discuss new
>>>>>>>>>>>>      features/wishes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> probably get a ranking of things to implement or
>>>>>>>>>>>> improve?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 05:29 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to
>>>>>>>>>>>> pack RC1 on
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Wednesday
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Thanks for participating :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> Or maybe even better to correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> (Configuration ->
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> User Interface -> Themes)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> And add section ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> I can add the page to
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <http://openmeetings.apache.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> Configuration -> Customization -> Styling
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> What do you think would it be OK?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn
>>>>>>>>>>>> <da...@vcrp.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to write
>>>>>>>>>>>>      it down
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> the documentation...
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> Am 20.01.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> To provide custom styling/layout you can modify
>>>>>>>>>>>> existing
>>>>>>>>>>>>      css files
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>      included
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> last,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> but I see not much sense in it ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> and you can do it as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> 1) create webapps/openmeetings/css/custom.css file
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> 2) open
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/openmeetings/web/pages/BasePage.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> add link to your new CSS file
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> something like this :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Peter Dähn
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <da...@vcrp.de <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> one more thing: is it possible to provide a
>>>>>>>>>>>> custom.css
>>>>>>>>>>>>      file to
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> provide custom layout somehow?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> I believe 3.2.0 should be released, I'm going
>>>>>>>>>>>> to implement
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527>
>>>>>>>>>>>> and would
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> pack RC1
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any critical
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> (you can use our demo for tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next>)
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> And IMHO we need to switch main stable
>>>>>>>>>>>> development branch to
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.x
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> 3.1.5 can be released in a week or so with
>>>>>>>>>>>> some critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> REST/SOAP
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to