Hello MAxim, thanks for your work, but the master branch does not work now with moodle 3.0 and OM 3.2. I've got a blank page and could only see the general chat.
And please could you set the version string to the version.php for those how work only with github as code reposistory? Thanks & Greetings, Michael Am 30.01.2017 um 14:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > Hello Michael, > > I have updated plugin > master branch is updated to work with OM 3.2 > Additional branch 2.7.3.2 was created > > build was updated to automatically set version from build.xml to > version.php (with release date) > So now for these 2 branches version should be specified in one place only > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hello Michael, >> >> plugin need to be updated >> this line [1] should be modified as follows >> -- $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/swf?&secureHash=" . $hash >> -- . "&scopeRoomId=" . $openmeetings->om->room_id >> -- . "&language=" . $openmeetings->om->language; >> >> ++ $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/hash?&secure=" . $hash >> ++ . "&language=" . $openmeetings->om->language; >> >> I'll create 3.2.0 compatible version later this week >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-moodle-plugin/blob/02b378e2b99504580143a6ca2c7a3dbb9e56c021/renderer.php#L123 >> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Michael Wuttke >> <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de> wrote: >>> Hello Maxim, >>> >>> the upgrade works but the moodle om plugin not. It is possible to create >>> a new room but not to enter a room. The om login page will be shown always. >>> >>> Thanks & Greetings, >>> Michael >>> >>> Am 29.01.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> Hello Michael, >>>> >>>> Sure you can upgrade, the upgrade process is usual >>>> >>>> Backup everything >>>> Create db >>>> Restore >>>> >>>> Moodle plugin should work as expected >>>> >>>> WBR, Maxim >>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>> >>>> On Jan 29, 2017 22:21, "Michael Wuttke" <mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de >>>> <mailto:mwut...@beuth-hochschule.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Maxim, >>>> >>>> two questions: >>>> - can I upgrade from OM 3.1.x to 3.2.0 or I have to install a new/fresh >>>> OM installation? >>>> - does the moodle om plugin some improvements? >>>> >>>> Thanks & Greetings, >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> Am 29.01.2017 um 08:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> > I'm going to start 3.2.0 release :)) >>>> > >>>> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >> Hello All, >>>> >> >>>> >> I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last >>>> minute" issues? >>>> >> :))) >>>> >> >>>> >> Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e. 3.1.5 will >>>> be the >>>> >> last 3.1.x release >>>> >> >>>> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks for the report Sebastian! >>>> >>> I was able to reproduce and fix this issue >>>> >>> demo is updated >>>> >>> >>>> >>> please let me know if anything else is broken ... >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks Sebastian, >>>> >>>> I'll double-check >>>> >>>> It was ok during my test, maybe will ask for the steps >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> WBR, Maxim >>>> >>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 24, 2017 04:02, "seba.wag...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>" <seba.wag...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Maxim, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> good work! I have seen some improvements/simplifications on the >>>> >>>> User-list. >>>> >>>> Less buttons. I think that is the right approach. Simpler user >>>> interface >>>> >>>> is >>>> >>>> better. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But I noticed that a bit of work is required in the Audio/Video >>>> >>>> settings. It >>>> >>>> works initially, but if you try to refresh (via the small icon >>>> in the >>>> >>>> video >>>> >>>> pod) or via triggering the modal/dialogue to choose different >>>> device >>>> >>>> settings via the user-list the video just becomes black and >>>> nothing >>>> >>>> happens >>>> >>>> anymore. Not possible to recover unless complete refresh of the >>>> browser. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think that flow requires some attention. Audio/Video settings is >>>> >>>> pretty >>>> >>>> much our core functionality. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Seb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-01-24 0:53 GMT+13:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de >>>> <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>>: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Dimitriy, >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> node.js for server-side js is a huge package that need to handled >>>> >>>>> somehow... I also don't know if this would be the best >>>> solution... >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> webRTC browser2browser will not scale for private user and their >>>> >>>>> dsl-connection. So webRTC or SIP/RTMP to a mediaserver that then >>>> >>>>> multicasts >>>> >>>>> to all peers sounds like a way to move away from flash... I >>>> think this >>>> >>>>> is >>>> >>>>> already discussed. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Anyway I have no experience in this area and I was wondering >>>> that this >>>> >>>>> guy >>>> >>>>> mentions a "simple solution". >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Greetings Peter >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Dmitriy -: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello Peter, >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm working on webRTC native client that can accept peer >>>> connection >>>> >>>>> from >>>> >>>>> browser. >>>> >>>>> We already have "serverlessmedia" solution "browser - to - >>>> browser" >>>> >>>>> with >>>> >>>>> our signal server in Java. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> We're moving to "peer-to-media server-to-all other peers" >>>> solution. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Do you know this guy? >>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/muaz-khan >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I know him, and even have tried to use his library >>>> recordRTC. >>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, It allows to capture media stream ("live >>>> video") only in >>>> >>>>> Chrome. Firefox just produces only one big chunk, IE/Edge doesn't >>>> >>>>> support >>>> >>>>> video etc. >>>> >>>>> I tried many times to use pure JavaScript solution but >>>> libraries not >>>> >>>>> ready >>>> >>>>> for this purposes (MediaRecorder API and MediaSources API) yet >>>> and also >>>> >>>>> our >>>> >>>>> stack of technology doesn't permit to use JavaScript on the >>>> server >>>> >>>>> side. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de >>>> <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I had a look around... >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I found this one... >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many >>>> >>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model >>>> (peer-to-media >>>> >>>>>> server-to-all other peers)." >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Do you know this guy? >>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/muaz-khan >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Greetings Peter >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Peter Dähn: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I thought the same about the general roadmap >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> 1st whiteborad (there was something in gsoc, right?) >>>> >>>>>> 2nd audio/video (also gsoc but not finally prototyped) >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Lets have a look, if we could get some input (and feedback!) >>>> from such >>>> >>>>>> whish-list... >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Wish list is good idea :) >>>> >>>>>> I guess it can be created from the list of JIRA issues, then >>>> discussed >>>> >>>>>> :) >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> My plans were to perform next steps to remove Flash :), >>>> >>>>>> 1) move WB to HTML5 >>>> >>>>>> 2) move Audio/Video ... >>>> >>>>>> last one seems to be tricky :( no POC yet :( >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de >>>> <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> nothing critical, rooms are working so far... >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> We will collect a few things regarding usability and look >>>> and feel. >>>> >>>>>>> Unfortunatly by now no time is left... I think we will >>>> report this >>>> >>>>>>> using >>>> >>>>>>> Jira... >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> btw.. Is there a kind of wish-list to discuss new >>>> features/wishes and >>>> >>>>>>> probably get a ranking of things to implement or improve? >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Greetings Peter >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 05:29 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to pack RC1 on >>>> >>>>>>> Wednesday >>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for participating :) >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> >>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Or maybe even better to correct >>>> >>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html >>>> <http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html> >>>> >>>>>>>> (Configuration -> >>>> >>>>>>>> User Interface -> Themes) >>>> >>>>>>>> And add section .... >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> >>>>>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> I can add the page to >>>> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/ >>>> <http://openmeetings.apache.org/> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Configuration -> Customization -> Styling >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you think would it be OK? >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de >>>> <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is enough to write >>>> it down >>>> >>>>>>>>>> in >>>> >>>>>>>>>> the documentation... >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 20.01.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> To provide custom styling/layout you can modify existing >>>> css files >>>> >>>>>>>>>> .... >>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it to be >>>> included >>>> >>>>>>>>>> last, >>>> >>>>>>>>>> but I see not much sense in it .... >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> and you can do it as follows: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1) create webapps/openmeetings/css/custom.css file >>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2) open >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/openmeetings/web/pages/BasePage.html >>>> >>>>>>>>>> add link to your new CSS file >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> something like this :) >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Peter Dähn >>>> <da...@vcrp.de <mailto:da...@vcrp.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> one more thing: is it possible to provide a custom.css >>>> file to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> provide custom layout somehow? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe 3.2.0 should be released, I'm going to implement >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527> and would >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> like to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> pack RC1 >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any critical issues. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (you can use our demo for tests: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next >>>> <https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next>) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And IMHO we need to switch main stable development branch >>>> to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.x >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.1.5 can be released in a week or so with some critical >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> REST/SOAP >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> fixes >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> -- >>>> >>>>>> WBR >>>> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>> >>>>> Dmitry Bezheckov. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>> <https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock> >>>> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> WBR >>>> >>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> WBR >>>> >> Maxim aka solomax >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax > > > -- Vielen Dank & mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Wuttke Moodle- & Unix-Mail-Administration Beuth Hochschule Berlin - Hochschulrechenzentrum Luxemburger Str. 10 13353 Berlin Tel: +49 (0)30 45 04 2004 Haus Bauwesen; Raum: D 225a E-Mail: michael.wut...@beuth-hochschule.de Moodle-News: https://lms.beuth-hochschule.de/rss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
