On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 18:53, Ali Alhaidary <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org> wrote:
> I assume that x.y.z is: > It depends :)) modern software has higher majors than old days :))) you can check for example browser versions :)) > x: major technology change: as 4 to 5 moving from flash to WebRTC, so 5 > stays. > y: introducing new functionality or big code change, since SIP is not > implemented yet, 0 stays, unless considering tables DB change that is not > compatible with 0, so it should be 1. > z: enhancements and bug fixing. which is a lot and has been going for > months and hundreds of hours of work and testing were put, so 2 is not good > enough, may be 4 or 5 (1 for each 25 build, after DB changes) > > So, it is either 5.1.0 (no technology change, but DB tables changed, using > the latest build) > > or, 5.0.5 (no technology change, no technology implemented within, so many > enhancements and bug fixing) > > I prefer 5.1.0 as we do consider DB table change a major core > modification, and when SIP is implemented, 5.2.0 can be announced, during > this period you can announce 5.1.1... on regular bases depending on build > numbers. > > And very important issue here is that data should be separated from code > and should be stated clearly in the installation manual. > > > On 11/20/20 10:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > BTW we can update the versioning > release 5.1.0 "as is" > and if/when SIP will be ready release 6.0.0 :)))) > > WDYT? > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 14:44, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 00:10, Ali Alhaidary <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org> >> wrote: >> >>> So 5.0.2 will be based on the latest build of 5.1.0, and you will keep >>> working on 5.1.0 snapshots ? >>> >> >> 5.0.2 will be based on _some_ build >> 5.1.0 is delayed due to SIP integration is not ready :( >> >> >>> On 11/19/20 7:21 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>> >>> yes >>> I would like to release 5.0.2 in a week or so >>> It will be based on current master >>> >>> there should be lot's of time to do some more testing >>> and maybe fix some bugs :))) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 23:09, Alvaro <zurca...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ...sorry you know how is my english. Then, that is a yes or a not? >>>> >>>> ................... >>>> >>>> >>>> El jue, 19-11-2020 a las 23:03 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió: >>>> >>>> I saw no votes against it >>>> so let it be 5.0.2 - another bug fix release for 5.0.0 :))) >>>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 22:39, Alvaro <zurca...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> ...Maxim, then the next release will be called 5.0.2? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> ................. >>>> >>>> El jue, 19-11-2020 a las 08:17 +0100, kaffeesurrogat escribió: >>>> > Hi Maxim, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 19/11/2020 02:53, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2514 >>>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2514> >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 08:27, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>> > > solomax...@gmail.com >>>> > > <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 00:08, kaffeesurrogat >>>> > > <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hi Maxim, >>>> > > >>>> > > just installed your latest build. Some things I like to >>>> > > address ..... >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > 1) The frontelements for invited users in a password >>>> > > protected >>>> > > room are back >>>> > > >>>> > > Many thanks ... ;-) >>>> > > >>>> > > 2) The camera/audio connections starts as soon as i'm >>>> > > entering a >>>> > > personal room. Didn't test with other rooms. It's the same >>>> > > with the >>>> > > guest invited. No need to give any permissions. It just >>>> > > happens ... >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > this is expected in room of type "conference" >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > stupid me, that was the difference between my previous setup and my >>>> > new >>>> > setup .... sorry for that .... >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > 3) If i hit the unenrool user button in the front end, the >>>> > > connection >>>> > > doesn't dissapear all the way. The video and audio stream >>>> > > of the >>>> > > unenrolled user stops but the unenrolled user stays in the >>>> > > room and >>>> > > still can use the pointer (google maps like symbol) tool. >>>> > > The Host sees the pointer blinking even so the user >>>> > > vanished from the >>>> > > user list. The guest which was unenrolled still has a full >>>> > > list of users >>>> > > cause he stays in the room. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > this seems to be broken >>>> > > please file JIRA >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > i will install the new build soon .... >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > 4) In the configuration menue the key >>>> > > personal.rooms.enabled >>>> > > vanished >>>> > > after i set it to false. It did not showing up again ;-( >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > this one I was unable to reproduce >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > personal.rooms.enabled is still gone .... will check if i can >>>> > reproduce >>>> > this after reinstall ... >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Have fun, >>>> > >>>> > kaffeesurrogat >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > By the way, >>>> > > >>>> > > openmeetings is the best product ever .... it is based on a >>>> > > great >>>> > > concept and helps a lot to do some online teaching .... >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks :) >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Have fun, >>>> > > >>>> > > kaffeesurrogat >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > ##################### installed version >>>> > > ############################## >>>> > > >>>> > > Name >>>> > > OpenMeetings >>>> > > Version >>>> > > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT >>>> > > Revision >>>> > > b9b202a >>>> > > Build date >>>> > > 2020-11-18T09:35:56Z >>>> > > >>>> > > ##################### installed version >>>> > > ############################## >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On 18/11/2020 17:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>> > > > Hello All, >>>> > > > >>>> > > > ATM we have 39 JIRA issues addressed >>>> > > > I would like to release 5.0.2 based on current >>>> > > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT in a >>>> > > > week or so >>>> > > > >>>> > > > implementation of SIP is moving slow, so one-two >>>> > > intermediate releases >>>> > > > might be good idea >>>> > > > What do you think? >>>> > > > >>>> > > > -- >>>> > > > Best regards, >>>> > > > Maxim >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Best regards, >>>> > > Maxim >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Best regards, >>>> > > Maxim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Maxim >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Maxim >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Maxim > > -- Best regards, Maxim
