:-)
On 11/20/20 4:05 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
I guess we will made everybody's life easier if we move to the
simpler versioning
So let it be
- 5.1.0
- 6.0.0
Are there any objections?
(minors will be for the "super fast" security fixed, like it was with
5.0.1 :)))
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 19:29, Ali Alhaidary
<ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org <mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
True, but that is because they have merged x and y together for
long period of time, but internally you might find a.b.c.x.y.z ...
On 11/20/20 3:12 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 18:53, Ali Alhaidary
<ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org
<mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
I assume that x.y.z is:
It depends :))
modern software has higher majors than old days :)))
you can check for example browser versions :))
x: major technology change: as 4 to 5 moving from flash to
WebRTC, so 5 stays.
y: introducing new functionality or big code change, since
SIP is not implemented yet, 0 stays, unless considering
tables DB change that is not compatible with 0, so it should
be 1.
z: enhancements and bug fixing. which is a lot and has been
going for months and hundreds of hours of work and testing
were put, so 2 is not good enough, may be 4 or 5 (1 for each
25 build, after DB changes)
So, it is either 5.1.0 (no technology change, but DB tables
changed, using the latest build)
or, 5.0.5 (no technology change, no technology implemented
within, so many enhancements and bug fixing)
I prefer 5.1.0 as we do consider DB table change a major core
modification, and when SIP is implemented, 5.2.0 can be
announced, during this period you can announce 5.1.1... on
regular bases depending on build numbers.
And very important issue here is that data should be
separated from code and should be stated clearly in the
installation manual.
On 11/20/20 10:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
BTW we can update the versioning
release 5.1.0 "as is"
and if/when SIP will be ready release 6.0.0 :))))
WDYT?
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 14:44, Maxim Solodovnik
<solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 00:10, Ali Alhaidary
<ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org
<mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
So 5.0.2 will be based on the latest build of 5.1.0,
and you will keep working on 5.1.0 snapshots ?
5.0.2 will be based on _some_ build
5.1.0 is delayed due to SIP integration is not ready :(
On 11/19/20 7:21 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
yes
I would like to release 5.0.2 in a week or so
It will be based on current master
there should be lot's of time to do some more testing
and maybe fix some bugs :)))
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 23:09, Alvaro
<zurca...@gmail.com <mailto:zurca...@gmail.com>> wrote:
...sorry you know how is my english. Then, that
is a yes or a not?
...................
El jue, 19-11-2020 a las 23:03 +0700, Maxim
Solodovnik escribió:
I saw no votes against it
so let it be 5.0.2 - another bug fix release
for 5.0.0 :)))
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 22:39, Alvaro
<zurca...@gmail.com
<mailto:zurca...@gmail.com>> wrote:
...Maxim, then the next release will be
called 5.0.2?
Thanks
.................
El jue, 19-11-2020 a las 08:17 +0100,
kaffeesurrogat escribió:
> Hi Maxim,
>
>
> On 19/11/2020 02:53, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2514
> >
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2514>
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 08:27, Maxim
Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
<mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com
<mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 00:08,
kaffeesurrogat
> > <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de
<mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>
<mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de
<mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > just installed your latest build.
Some things I like to
> > address .....
> >
> >
> > 1) The frontelements for invited
users in a password
> > protected
> > room are back
> >
> > Many thanks ... ;-)
> >
> > 2) The camera/audio connections
starts as soon as i'm
> > entering a
> > personal room. Didn't test with other
rooms. It's the same
> > with the
> > guest invited. No need to give any
permissions. It just
> > happens ...
> >
> >
> > this is expected in room of type
"conference"
> >
>
> stupid me, that was the difference between
my previous setup and my
> new
> setup .... sorry for that ....
>
> >
> >
> > 3) If i hit the unenrool user
button in the front end, the
> > connection
> > doesn't dissapear all the way. The video
and audio stream
> > of the
> > unenrolled user stops but the unenrolled
user stays in the
> > room and
> > still can use the pointer (google maps
like symbol) tool.
> > The Host sees the pointer blinking even
so the user
> > vanished from the
> > user list. The guest which was
unenrolled still has a full
> > list of users
> > cause he stays in the room.
> >
> >
> > this seems to be broken
> > please file JIRA
> >
>
> i will install the new build soon ....
>
>
> >
> >
> > 4) In the configuration menue the key
> > personal.rooms.enabled
> > vanished
> > after i set it to false. It did not
showing up again ;-(
> >
> >
> > this one I was unable to reproduce
> >
>
> personal.rooms.enabled is still gone ....
will check if i can
> reproduce
> this after reinstall ...
>
>
> Have fun,
>
> kaffeesurrogat
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > By the way,
> >
> > openmeetings is the best product ever
.... it is based on a
> > great
> > concept and helps a lot to do some
online teaching ....
> >
> >
> > Thanks :)
> >
> >
> >
> > Have fun,
> >
> > kaffeesurrogat
> >
> >
> >
> > ##################### installed version
> > ##############################
> >
> > Name
> > OpenMeetings
> > Version
> > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > Revision
> > b9b202a
> > Build date
> > 2020-11-18T09:35:56Z
> >
> > ##################### installed version
> > ##############################
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18/11/2020 17:47, Maxim
Solodovnik wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > ATM we have 39 JIRA issues
addressed
> > > I would like to release 5.0.2
based on current
> > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT in a
> > > week or so
> > >
> > > implementation of SIP is moving
slow, so one-two
> > intermediate releases
> > > might be good idea
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Maxim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
--
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Best regards,
Maxim
