No worries Arne, rolling a new take is not a big effort.

I'm not sure though how we should treat the webbeans-cdi11 module. Imo it being 
only included in the source release but not in the build is an ok alternative. 
I can tweak this but I'd rather not contain it directly in the build.

LieGrue,
strub







>________________________________
> From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; openwebbeans-dev 
><[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 13:07
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
> 
>
>Damn, this is a
>-1
>for me, sorry
>
>Then we should fix the license issue, too.
>
>Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>Antworten an: 
>"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>Datum: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 16:16
>An: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
>openwebbeans-dev 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>
>oops, missed: 
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/webbeans-cdi11/pom.xml
> -> the parent is not correct
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>2013/5/8 Romain Manni-Bucau 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>+1
>
>side note: seems we still include javassist licences 
>http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/licenses.html, 
>is it intended?
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>2013/5/8 Jens Schumann 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a lot 
>around interceptors (for observer methods and even life cycle callbacks) if 
>applied during ProcessAnnotatedType. In 1.1.x I encountered strange situations 
>where it sometimes worked and sometimes not. From what I understood it was 
>related to the order classes where processed.
>
>So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot.
>
>Jens
>
>
>
>On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" 
><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 .
>>
>> This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch.
>> This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets
>> the CDI-1.0 specification.
>>
>> Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules like
>> webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though.
>>
>>
>> The ReleaseNotes are available online:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12315461
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/
>>
>> SVN source tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/
>>
>> Source Release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> Binary release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.0-binary.zip
>>
>> PGP release key 2FDB81B1 
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>
>> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to