I just fixed the LICENSE files. So please go on and do a re-roll. Cheers, Arne
Am 09.05.13 15:13 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <[email protected]>: >No worries Arne, rolling a new take is not a big effort. > >I'm not sure though how we should treat the webbeans-cdi11 module. Imo it >being only included in the source release but not in the build is an ok >alternative. >I can tweak this but I'd rather not contain it directly in the build. > >LieGrue, >strub > > > > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]> >>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; openwebbeans-dev >><[email protected]> >>Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 13:07 >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 >> >> >>Damn, this is a >>-1 >>for me, sorry >> >>Then we should fix the license issue, too. >> >>Von: Romain Manni-Bucau >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>Antworten an: >>"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>Datum: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 16:16 >>An: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, >>openwebbeans-dev >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 >> >>oops, missed: >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/web >>beans-cdi11/pom.xml -> the parent is not correct >> >> >>Romain Manni-Bucau >>Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >>2013/5/8 Romain Manni-Bucau >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>+1 >> >>side note: seems we still include javassist licences >>http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/licenses. >>html, is it intended? >> >>Romain Manni-Bucau >>Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >>2013/5/8 Jens Schumann >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a >>lot around interceptors (for observer methods and even life cycle >>callbacks) if applied during ProcessAnnotatedType. In 1.1.x I >>encountered strange situations where it sometimes worked and sometimes >>not. From what I understood it was related to the order classes where >>processed. >> >>So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot. >> >>Jens >> >> >> >>On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 . >>> >>> This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. >>> This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets >>> the CDI-1.0 specification. >>> >>> Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules >>>like >>> webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though. >>> >>> >>> The ReleaseNotes are available online: >>> >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231084 >>>4&version=12315461 >>> >>> Maven staging repo: >>> >>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans >>>-016/ >>> >>> SVN source tag: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/ >>> >>> Source Release: >>> >>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans >>>-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-sourc >>>e-release.zip >>> >>> Binary release: >>> >>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans >>>-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbean >>>s-distribution-1.2.0-binary.zip >>> >>> PGP release key 2FDB81B1 >>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS >>> >>> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours. >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why) >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >> >> >> >>
