Josh, Thank you for the detailed response. I'm glad to hear Avatica maintains backward compatibility.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi there, > > In general, no, you should not see issues. We (really, Avatica -- the > project "powering" PQS) strives to make changes to the wire-protocol in a > backwards compatible manner. Avatica also includes a basic framework to do > forward and backwards compatibility testing. > > You are more likely to run into issues where the 4.7 client is simply > doing the wrong thing. There have been one or two issues like these. > CALCITE-1103 is one that I can find easily (truncation around decimal > datatypes). > > > On 9/19/17 2:16 PM, Yan Koyfman wrote: > >> Would we run into issues when working with a newer PQS server (4.11) and >> a 4.7 client library? In general I'm curious if there is backward >> compatibility between mixed server / client versions. >> >> Thanks >> >>
