This is a great find. Please file a ticket. My guess is that there is some backtracking in the parser, which explodes for large values.
2012/6/26 Clay B. <c...@clayb.net> > It's worth pointing out that Pig 0.9.2 also runs quickly; we only see the > degradation with Pig 0.10.0. > > The degradation in performance seems to have a knee as 4 or 5 conditionals > works as expected but as presented, the script takes about 6 minutes at the > GRUNT> prompt after hitting enter; before any Hadoop execution. > > -Clay > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Danfeng Li wrote: > > >> We found the following simple logic will cause very long compiling time >> for pig 0.10.0, while using pig 0.8.1, >> everything is fine. >> >> >> >> A = load 'A.txt' using PigStorage() AS (m: int); >> >> >> >> B = FOREACH A { >> >> days_str = (chararray) >> >> (m == 1 ? 31: >> >> (m == 2 ? 28: >> >> (m == 3 ? 31: >> >> (m == 4 ? 30: >> >> (m == 5 ? 31: >> >> (m == 6 ? 30: >> >> (m == 7 ? 31: >> >> (m == 8 ? 31: >> >> (m == 9 ? 30: >> >> (m == 10 ? 31: >> >> (m == 11 ? 30:31))))))))))); >> >> GENERATE >> >> days_str as days_str; >> >> } >> >> store B into 'B'; >> >> >> >> here’s the pig version we used in the test >> >> Apache Pig version 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT (rexported) >> >> >> >> >> >> Attached is the pig code and an example input file. >> >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >> >> >>