Greg started another thread titled 'Editor transitions' which is discusses how to address this issue. Please have a look at that (and feel free to contribute). It is probably best to wait and see what comes of that before taking the time to create an example. It looks like the RowEditor API might change again and I don't want to make extra work for you.
Chris On 2 December 2010 00:33, lello <[email protected]> wrote: > > Before I try to write some whort example I can confirm you that the error > is > there only when I use a transition effect. > Indeed, when I implement keyPressed in my rowEditor even if I send a > close() > command the editing is still taking place, I can check this using > isEditing() which returns true even after a close(). When there is no > transition effect isEditing() returns false after close(), and theJust to > let code works. > (In any case, the code posted above is not correct, I cannot call > getTableView() after close(), what I do is just to select the row and then > selectedRowChanged() close the editor. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-pivot-users.399431.n3.nabble.com/TableView-selectedRowChanged-tp1992938p2000611.html > Sent from the Apache Pivot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
