Lello, I just checked in an update that should allow your app to work as you described. Please let me know if you run into any additional issues. G
On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Greg Brown wrote: > Since you have confirmed that disabling the transition resolves the issue, I > don't think the sample code will be necessary. I'll try to put out a fix for > your issue this afternoon. > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Chris Bartlett wrote: > >> Greg started another thread titled 'Editor transitions' which is discusses >> how to address this issue. Please have a look at that (and feel free to >> contribute). >> It is probably best to wait and see what comes of that before taking the >> time to create an example. It looks like the RowEditor API might change >> again and I don't want to make extra work for you. >> >> Chris >> >> On 2 December 2010 00:33, lello <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Before I try to write some whort example I can confirm you that the error is >> there only when I use a transition effect. >> Indeed, when I implement keyPressed in my rowEditor even if I send a close() >> command the editing is still taking place, I can check this using >> isEditing() which returns true even after a close(). When there is no >> transition effect isEditing() returns false after close(), and theJust to >> let code works. >> (In any case, the code posted above is not correct, I cannot call >> getTableView() after close(), what I do is just to select the row and then >> selectedRowChanged() close the editor. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-pivot-users.399431.n3.nabble.com/TableView-selectedRowChanged-tp1992938p2000611.html >> Sent from the Apache Pivot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >
