Hi Edward,

Thanks. Yes, please move RANGER-699 enhancement work to the master branch.

Thanks,
Madhan




On 10/30/15, 12:57 PM, "Zhang, Edward (GDI Hadoop)" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Madhan,
>
>Congrats for this merge. Does that mean my jira ticket
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-699 should be based on the
>new master branch?
>I have done the development in tag-policy branch, if yes, I would move
>that to master first.
>
>Thanks
>Edward Zhang
>
>On 10/28/15, 14:51, "Madhan Neethiraj" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>All,
>>
>>Tag-based policies feature implementation is now merged in Apache Ranger
>>master branch (from tag-policy branch). Going forward, any updates to
>>tag-based policies implementation will be done the master and no updates
>>are expected in tag-policy branch.
>>
>>This feature is a significant addition to Apache Ranger, which enables
>>separation of resource-classification and access authorization roles.
>>This feature empowers security administrators to use a single policy to
>>control access to resources across various Hadoop components. The
>>implementation also includes integration with Apache
>>Atlas<http://atlas.incubator.apache.org>, a data governance and metadata
>>framework for Hadoop, which supports classification of resources and
>>other feature like lineage.
>>
>>Here are documents for the features added to master with this merge:
>>
>>  *   Tag-based 
>>policies<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Tag+Based+Poli
>>cies>
>>  *   Tag 
>>Synchronizer<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Tag+Synchr
>>onizer+Installation+and+Configuration>
>>  *   Deny 
>>conditions<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Deny-conditi
>>ons+and+excludes+in+Ranger+policies>
>>  *   Geo-location based
>>policies<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Geo-location+b
>>ased+policies>
>>
>>It took a very dedicated set of Rangers ­ Abhay, Gautam, Bosco, Balaji,
>>Selva, Vel, Alok, Ramesh, Erik, Tom, and more ­ to make this happen! Go
>>Rangers!!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Madhan
>>
>
>

Reply via email to