On 1/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should add 105-snap and 104-release to the jira versions
Version "1.0.5-SNAPSHOT" is already there. The "1.0.4-SNAPSHOT" version will get converted into "1.0.4" as a byproduct of the release process that Rahul is executing. But, in this particular case, it didn't get fixed in 1.0.4, so we would want to tag this as being fixed only in "1.0.5-SNAPSHOT" and "1.1.0-SNAPSHOT". (howto do that?) This just takes JIRA admin privileges, which I have but can happily share. Give me a shout if you'd like the ability to do that kind of thing. Craig On 1/22/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 1/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess since other will run into this, > > > I created a ticket and marked it as fixed for 1.1.0 > > > so the release notes contain that ;) > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-394 > > > > > <snip/> > > > > Thanks, seems like a good example of something that should be applied > > to the 1_0_X branch too. Would you like to do that as well? > > > Agreed, although in general I also think you're setting a good precedent by > asking for agreement (lazy consensus) first. > > -Rahul > > > Craig > > > On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > > > So, I suppose I don't need to open an issue anymore ? > > > > > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > > > > De : Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > À : user@shale.apache.org > > > > Envoyé le : Dimanche, 21 Janvier 2007, 23h40mn 24s > > > > Objet : Re: [Shale view 1.0.4] > > > > > > > > fixed already in current trunk > > > > > > > > (see svn commit: r497775) > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/view/faces/ViewPhaseListener.java?view=diff&r1=497774&r2=497775&pathrev=497775 > > > > > > > > > > > > thx, > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 1/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think there's a little bug on shale view 1.0.4. > > > > > > > > > > > > Shale View : Bug on render response phase when removing view from > > request > > > > > > map. > > > > > > > > > > > > Error in org.apache.shale.view.faces.ViewPhaseListener, method > > > > > > afterRenderResponse, lien 233 : > > > > > > iterator obtained from map, code calling map.remove, and afterward > > using > > > > > > iterator which generated ConcurrentModificationException. > > > > > > > > <snip/> > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
