Hello Christopher, Users keep asking for varagrs [1]. However, as I stated at the time, given that SLF4J is intended used by all sorts of libraries, the dependency graph between libraries and SLF4J can be surprisingly complex. In particular, it would not be unusual for the dependency graph to have multiple dependencies on SLF4J with *different* versions. Thus, we have to be extra-careful and conservative when changing the SLF4J API.
I regret to disappoint our users but except for bug fixes, do not expect any changes to the SLF4J API. [1] http://www.slf4j.org/pipermail/user/2008-January/000468.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Has there been any more discussion lately about updating the API to > support varargs and perhaps printf? -- Ceki Gülcü QOS.ch is looking to hire talented developers in Switzerland. If interested, please contact c e k i AT q o s . c h _______________________________________________ user mailing list user@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
