Thanks for the info. It seems like the JTS library is exactly what I
need (I'm not doing any raster processing at this point).

So, once they successfully finish the Scala wrappers for JTS, I would
theoretically be able to use Scala to write a Spark job that includes
the JTS library, and then run it across a Spark cluster? That is
absolutely fantastic!

I'll have to look into contributing to the JTS wrapping effort.

Thanks again!
On 14-04-2014 at 2:25 PM, "Josh Marcus"  wrote:Hey there,
I'd encourage you to check out the development currently going on with
the GeoTrellis project(http://github.com/geotrellis/geotrellis) or
talk to the developers on irc (freenode, #geotrellis) as they're
currently developing raster processing capabilities with spark as a
backend, as well as scala wrappersfor JTS (for calculations about
geometry features).
--j
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:00 PM, neveroutgunned  wrote:
 Greetings Spark users/devs! I'm interested in using Spark to process
large volumes of data with a geospatial component, and I haven't been
able to find much information on Spark's ability to handle this kind
of operation. I don't need anything too complex; just distance between
two points, point-in-polygon and the like.
Does Spark (or possibly Shark) support this kind of query? Has anyone
written a plugin/extension along these lines?

If there isn't anything like this so far, then it seems like I have
two options. I can either abandon Spark and fall back on Hadoop and
Hive with the ESRI Tools extension, or I can stick with Spark and try
to write/port a GIS toolkit. Which option do you think I should
pursue? How hard is it for someone that's new to the Spark codebase to
write an extension? Is there anyone else in the community that would
be interested in having geospatial capability in Spark?
Thanks for your help!
-------------------------
 View this message in context: Is Spark a good choice for
geospatial/GIS applications? Is a community volunteer needed in this
area?
 Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.

Reply via email to