Hi Daniel
Thanks for your reply, While I think for reduceByKey, it will also do
map side combine, thus extra the result is the same, say, for each partition,
one entry per distinct word. In my case with javaserializer, 240MB dataset
yield to around 70MB shuffle data. Only that shuffle Spill ( memory ) is
abnormal, and sounds to me should not trigger at all. And, by the way, this
behavior only occurs in map out side, on reduce / shuffle fetch side, this
strange behavior won't happen.
Best Regards,
Raymond Liu
From: Daniel Darabos [mailto:daniel.dara...@lynxanalytics.com]
I have no idea why shuffle spill is so large. But this might make it smaller:
val addition = (a: Int, b: Int) => a + b
val wordsCount = wordsPair.combineByKey(identity, addition, addition)
This way only one entry per distinct word will end up in the shuffle for each
partition, instead of one entry per word occurrence.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Liu, Raymond <raymond....@intel.com> wrote:
Hi Patrick
I am just doing simple word count , the data is generated by hadoop
random text writer.
This seems to me not quite related to compress , If I turn off compress
on shuffle, the metrics is something like below for the smaller 240MB Dataset.
Executor ID Address Task Time Total Tasks Failed Tasks
Succeeded Tasks Shuffle Read Shuffle Write Shuffle Spill (Memory) Shuffle
Spill (Disk)
10 sr437:48527 35 s 8 0 8 0.0 B 2.5 MB 2.2 GB
1291.2 KB
12 sr437:46077 34 s 8 0 8 0.0 B 2.5 MB 1822.6
MB 1073.3 KB
13 sr434:37896 31 s 8 0 8 0.0 B 2.4 MB 1099.2
MB 621.2 KB
15 sr438:52819 31 s 8 0 8 0.0 B 2.5 MB 1898.8
MB 1072.6 KB
16 sr434:37103 32 s 8 0 8 0.0 B 2.4 MB 1638.0
MB 1044.6 KB
And the program pretty simple:
val files = sc.textFile(args(1))
val words = files.flatMap(_.split(" "))
val wordsPair = words.map(x => (x, 1))
val wordsCount = wordsPair.reduceByKey(_ + _)
val count = wordsCount.count()
println("Number of words = " + count)
Best Regards,
Raymond Liu
From: Patrick Wendell [mailto:pwend...@gmail.com]
Could you explain more what your job is doing and what data types you are
using? These numbers alone don't necessarily indicate something is wrong. The
relationship between the in-memory and on-disk shuffle amount is definitely a
bit strange, the data gets compressed when written to disk, but unless you have
a weird dataset (E.g. all zeros) I wouldn't expect it to compress _that_ much.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Liu, Raymond <raymond....@intel.com> wrote:
Hi
I am running a simple word count program on spark standalone cluster.
The cluster is made up of 6 node, each run 4 worker and each worker own 10G
memory and 16 core thus total 96 core and 240G memory. ( well, also used to
configed as 1 worker with 40G memory on each node )
I run a very small data set (2.4GB on HDFS on total) to confirm the
problem here as below:
As you can read from part of the task metrics as below, I noticed that
the shuffle spill part of metrics indicate that there are something wrong.
Executor ID Address Task Time Total Tasks Failed Tasks
Succeeded Tasks Shuffle Read Shuffle Write Shuffle Spill (Memory) Shuffle
Spill (Disk)
0 sr437:42139 29 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 4.3 MB 23.6 GB
4.3 MB
1 sr433:46935 1.1 min 4 0 4 0.0 B 4.2 MB 19.0 GB
3.4 MB
10 sr436:53277 26 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 4.3 MB 25.6 GB
4.6 MB
11 sr437:58872 32 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 4.3 MB 25.0 GB
4.4 MB
12 sr435:48358 27 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 4.3 MB 25.1 GB
4.4 MB
You can see that the Shuffle Spill (Memory) is pretty high, almost 5000x of the
actual shuffle data and Shuffle Spill (Disk), and also it seems to me that by
no means that the spill should trigger, since the memory is not used up at all.
To verify that I further reduce the data size to 240MB on total
And here is the result:
Executor ID Address Task Time Total Tasks Failed Tasks
Succeeded Tasks Shuffle Read Shuffle Write Shuffle Spill (Memory) Shuffle
Spill (Disk)
0 sr437:50895 15 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 703.0 KB
80.0 MB 43.2 KB
1 sr433:50207 17 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 704.7 KB
389.5 MB 90.2 KB
10 sr436:56352 16 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 700.9 KB
814.9 MB 181.6 KB
11 sr437:53099 15 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 689.7 KB
0.0 B 0.0 B
12 sr435:48318 15 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 702.1 KB
427.4 MB 90.7 KB
13 sr433:59294 17 s 4 0 4 0.0 B 704.8 KB
779.9 MB 180.3 KB
Nothing prevent spill from happening.
Now, there seems to me that there must be something wrong with the spill
trigger codes.
So anyone encounter this issue? By the way, I am using latest trunk code.
Best Regards,
Raymond Liu
